Teams

T.Kozacko 3.5 18+

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-02vs Y.BarthesWon 10
W#3 DoublesTobi Buckley / Diane Sauer vs Angki Sager / Holly Haney6-3, 6-2
2023-04-26vs J.FOGLEMANWon 10
W#2 DoublesTobi Buckley / Amy Merdes vs Alison Bernhardt / Jennifer Fogleman6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2023-04-25vs R.MillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesTobi Buckley / Diane Sauer vs Sherrie Smith / Kesah DeLisio3-6, 1-6
2023-04-18vs A.Sheehan18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTobi Buckley / Tammy Kozacko vs Laura Clark / Mary Dee Smith1-6, 1-6
2023-04-11vs G.FLYNNWon 10
W#1 DoublesTobi Buckley / Diane Sauer vs Holly Camak / Jolyne Taylor6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-03-28vs A.Jones 18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesTobi Buckley / Diane Sauer vs Traci Brooks / Laura Ross7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-21vs C.McCulloughSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTammy Kozacko / Amy Merdes vs Jennifer McCown / Leslie O'Brien4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiane Sauer / Kim Johnson vs Kylie Harris / Malinda Schantz6-1, 6-1
2023-03-14vs M.LaddWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Sauer / Tobi Buckley vs Jill David / Karin Reed6-1, 6-4
2023-03-07vs D.Allen/APleasantsLost 01
L#2 DoublesTobi Buckley / Amy Merdes vs Diane Allen / Angela Pleasants0-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Wendy Lindberg
published
3.39
Diane Sauer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Meike Schacht
published
Christine Rowe
published 3.5
3.20
Tammy Kozacko
published
3.17
Tobi Buckley
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.11
Phyllis Soltz
published
3.06
Amy Merdes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tobi Buckley + Amy Merdes12852% games+4.7% vs expected
Tobi Buckley + Diane Sauer443054% games+1.5% vs expected
Amy Merdes + Diane Sauer4159% gamesnot enough data
Phyllis Soltz + Tammy Kozacko224 matchesnot enough data
Tobi Buckley + Meike Schacht213 matchesnot enough data
Phyllis Soltz + Amy Merdes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy Lindberg
22W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Diane Sauer
136W–88L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
3.39
Meike Schacht
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Christine Rowe
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tammy Kozacko
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Tobi Buckley
146W–124L career · 8 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Phyllis Soltz
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Amy Merdes
90W–118L career · 3 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.