Teams

KPollak-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-29vs KGreen-DURLost 02
L#1 SinglesButton Hall vs Amber Bowden2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesAna Goodwin vs Laura Carlson6-7, 4-6
2026-06-22vs MLong-DURSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKathryn Pollak vs Terri Tarrant6-1, 4-3
L#2 SinglesAna Goodwin vs Jill Akiyama6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2026-06-15vs HRoss-DURLost 12
L#1 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Kelsey Kowalski4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKathryn Pollak vs Maya Hahn2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesAna Goodwin vs Carolyn Lee2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-08vs KGreen-DURLost 12
W#1 SinglesAmber Cagle vs Jennifer Kuzma3-4
L#2 SinglesKathryn Pollak vs Amber Bowden4-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesMiho Ogura vs Loralie Bible6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-06-01vs MLong-DURSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAmber Cagle vs Jill Akiyama2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Esmeralda Contreras6-0, 6-0
2026-05-18vs HRoss-DURLost 02
L#1 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Kelsey Kowalski4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesMiho Ogura vs Justyne Ross1-6, 3-6
2026-05-11vs KGreen-DURWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmber Cagle vs Elizabeth Chan6-3, 7-5
W#3 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-04vs MLong-DURLost 12
W#1 SinglesAmber Cagle vs Katya Lundberg6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Lina Habib4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesKathryn Pollak vs Dallas Knight3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KPollak-DUR1771736244

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Hannah Silverstein
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.69
Amber Cagle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.58
Button Hall
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.47
Kathryn Pollak
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.46
Ana Goodwin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.45
Miho Ogura
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber Cagle + Button Hall213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hannah Silverstein
67W–104L career · 9 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Amber Cagle
214W–100L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Button Hall
223W–223L career · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
Kathryn Pollak
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Ana Goodwin
62W–42L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Miho Ogura
277W–247L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.