Teams

BC-WestEnd/TerriDiamond

2024 SO CAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Becky McGilley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.49
Suzette Ibanez
published
2.98
Leslie Gibbs
published
2.97
Serena Jaklich
published
2.95
Laura Hamilton
published
2.90
Linda Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Takako Tary
published
2.83
Kyoko Yamada
published
2.78
Nina Allerton
published
2.76
Deborah Hurwicz
published 3
2.73
Kay Cotter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Terri Diamond
published
2.55
Susan Irvine
published
2.47
Eve Gentry
published
Elizabeth Dumont
published
Tracy Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Takako Tary + Kyoko Yamada4649% games+2.5% vs expected
Kay Cotter + Terri Diamond033 matchesnot enough data
Terri Diamond + Serena Jaklich213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Becky McGilley
76W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
Suzette Ibanez
19W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
Leslie Gibbs
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
Serena Jaklich
14W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
Laura Hamilton
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Linda Snyder
108W–99L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
Takako Tary
13W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Kyoko Yamada
9W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Nina Allerton
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Deborah Hurwicz
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Kay Cotter
155W–94L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Terri Diamond
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
Susan Irvine
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
Eve Gentry
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.47
Elizabeth Dumont
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracy Thompson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.