Teams

BCST BLUE

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TRIO

8 players · average NTRP 2.71 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-04vs NJ BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatty Archuleta / Liz Crowell vs Heather Roberts / Svitlana Pylypenko6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesColleen Callahan vs Liz Mercado4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Antony / Amanda Edgar vs Lindsay Thompson / INNA SELIVERSTOVA4-6, 1-6
2024-04-30vs LEBTC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesColleen Callahan / Liz Crowell vs Sabrina Smith / Brooke Cheishvili6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAnn Symalla vs Mollie Anderson2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPatty Archuleta / Kimberley Hoefen vs Sarah Hays / Sheryl Rose7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-20vs KC-CC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesPatty Archuleta / Michelle Johnston vs Leslie Hull / Kelly Molnar3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCasey Johnston / Amanda Edgar vs Lindsey Morrison / Lauren Hamill6-3, 7-6
2024-04-13vs LEBTC NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichelle Johnston / Kathleen Antony vs Rebecca Yao / Keri Hanson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Symalla / Jody Monroe vs LeAnn Joswick / Shelly Smith0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Patty Archuleta
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Liz Crowell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Colleen Callahan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.49
Ann Symalla
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.40
Amanda Edgar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.29
Kathleen Antony
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.21
Jody Monroe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Kimberley Hoefen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Symalla + Jody Monroe4259% games+10.1% vs expected
Ann Symalla + Kathleen Antony4352% games+7.9% vs expected
Patty Archuleta + Kimberley Hoefen2548% games−4.2% vs expected
Jody Monroe + Kathleen Antony5159% gamesnot enough data
Kimberley Hoefen + Liz Crowell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Patty Archuleta
75W–149L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Liz Crowell
51W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.59
3
Colleen Callahan
55W–80L career · 2 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.57
2.5
Ann Symalla
70W–108L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%52%48%
2.49
2.5
Amanda Edgar
33W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%79%21%
2.40
2.5
Kathleen Antony
63W–88L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Jody Monroe
48W–31L career · 1 line in 2024
0%99%1%
2.21
Kimberley Hoefen
17W–31L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.