Teams

KC-CC ORANGE

2023 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-14vs MC BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Sharpeta / Ken Sharpeta vs Keelia Corcoran / Thomas Crane2-6, 3-6
2023-05-07vs PH BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesJeff Eversman / Cari Eversman vs Scott Prussia / Kristine Kuettel1-6, 3-6
2023-04-30vs LEBTC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesCari Eversman / Jeff Eversman vs Lauren Austin / Stephan Termaat6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHolly Sharpeta / Ken Sharpeta vs Vanessa Parsons / Charles Parsons6-2, 6-2
2023-04-23vs NJ GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesCari Eversman / Jeff Eversman vs Susan Bolton / Jason Bolton6-1, 7-6
2023-04-16vs KC-CC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesHolly Sharpeta / Ken Sharpeta vs Kim Rachwalski / Joseph Rachwalski3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCari Eversman / Jeff Eversman vs Ken Eiken / Char Eiken6-3, 6-4
2023-04-02vs NJ ORANGELost 02
L#2 DoublesKen Sharpeta / Holly Sharpeta vs Amal Chandran / Caitlin Bock4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCari Eversman / Jeff Eversman vs Jim Burgert / Linda Prior0-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Jeff Eversman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Ken Sharpeta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Sarah Bryan
published
3.28
Holly Sharpeta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Amanda Mueller
published 3
3.01
Cari Eversman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.71
Kathleen Rose
published
Jason Rose
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cari Eversman + Jeff Eversman131451% games+2.5% vs expected
Holly Sharpeta + Ken Sharpeta181451% games−3.4% vs expected
Kathleen Rose + Jason Rose2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jeff Eversman
39W–26L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Ken Sharpeta
56W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Sarah Bryan
30W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Holly Sharpeta
101W–68L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3
Amanda Mueller
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.10
3
Cari Eversman
96W–57L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
Kathleen Rose
9W–23L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
Jason Rose
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.