Teams

SD 4.0 Peninsula TC (Sun 2:30)/ Eade

2026 SoCal Fall Doubles WE- San Diego · SD Women 4.0 GNO

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SD Women 4.0 GNO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Kathleen Keh
published 4
3.83
Elizabeth McLean
published
3.72
Kristine Nguyen
published
3.69
christine nishiyama
published 3.5
3.67
Sarah Eade
published
3.61
Yvonne Hwang
published
3.60
Patricia HOLMAN
published
3.58
Erica Miller
published
3.58
Dana Davalos
published 3.5
3.55
Lorena Whiteside
published 3.5
3.49
Yekaterina Smotrich
published 3.5
Megan Trentacosta
published
Rene Carmichael
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yekaterina Smotrich + christine nishiyama8067% games+8.7% vs expected
Yekaterina Smotrich + Dana Davalos4162% gamesnot enough data
Dana Davalos + Lorena Whiteside314 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Keh + Yekaterina Smotrich303 matchesnot enough data
Yekaterina Smotrich + Kristine Nguyen123 matchesnot enough data
Yekaterina Smotrich + Lorena Whiteside303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kathleen Keh
64W–32L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
Elizabeth McLean
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Kristine Nguyen
15W–3L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
christine nishiyama
35W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.69
Sarah Eade
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Yvonne Hwang
6W–10L career · no lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.61
Patricia HOLMAN
8W–12L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Erica Miller
10W–9L career · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Dana Davalos
90W–54L career · no lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.58
3.5
Lorena Whiteside
77W–31L career · no lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Yekaterina Smotrich
176W–89L career · no lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Megan Trentacosta
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rene Carmichael
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.