Teams

BC-SouthEnd/ColleenJohnson

2023 Adult 40 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.55 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Noreen Wenjen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Kristin Almeida
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Debbie Tran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.37
Vanessa Hyttenberg
published
3.37
Denise Matsumoto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Aimee Kuan
published 3.5
3.27
Cindy Monticue
published 3.5
3.21
Suzanne Scott
published
3.20
Colleen Johnson
published 3.5
3.13
Linda Stone
published
3.07
Xiomara Comrie
published
3.04
Barbara Hemmerich
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Theresa Riley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Huong Mary Lai
published
3.01
Marie Bald
published
2.98
Paulette Mashaka
published
2.57
Cheryl Unrein
published 3
Terry Paine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Bald + Cindy Monticue1545% games−7.8% vs expected
Noreen Wenjen + Kristin Almeida16561% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Almeida + Aimee Kuan134 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Tran + Kristin Almeida213 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Hemmerich + Theresa Riley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Noreen Wenjen
92W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Kristin Almeida
78W–51L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.46
4
Debbie Tran
98W–98L career · 2 lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.40
Vanessa Hyttenberg
10W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Denise Matsumoto
212W–93L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Aimee Kuan
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Cindy Monticue
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Suzanne Scott
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Colleen Johnson
3W–17L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.20
Linda Stone
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Xiomara Comrie
1W–15L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Barbara Hemmerich
79W–90L career · 4 lines in 2023
38%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Theresa Riley
64W–66L career · 2 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Huong Mary Lai
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
Marie Bald
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.01
Paulette Mashaka
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Cheryl Unrein
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.57
Terry Paine
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.