Teams

Sanders

2026 Anne Arundel Singles · Anne Arundel Singles 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings3 teams · Anne Arundel Singles 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fretz000000
2Sanders000000
3Erdely 2026 4.0 Singles000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Bryan Williams
published 4
3.77
Enrico Capitan
published 4
3.77
Ty Sanders
published
3.60
Fengji Zhang
published 3.5
3.55
Nnamaka Nwakaihe
published
3.25
Andrew Isch
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bryan Williams
10W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Enrico Capitan
88W–85L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Ty Sanders
28W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.77
3.5
Fengji Zhang
41W–28L career · no lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.60
Nnamaka Nwakaihe
16W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Andrew Isch
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.