Teams

Sentell/META

2026 Adult 55 & Over-META · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-26vs Hagood55+3.5/METAWon 21
L#1 DoublesGail Archer / Lisa Scherping vs Lisa Hill / Shawn Dougherty6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMarcia Sentell / Pam Mobley vs Mary Warner / Keo Jur2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKimberly Keith / Robin Dimona vs Anita Jilton / Regan Jordan6-2, 6-4
2026-04-15vs Hagood55+3.5/METAWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnnette Clemons / Marcia Sentell vs Donna Morris / Holli Cox6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRobin Dimona / Pam Mobley vs Mary Warner / Anita Jilton4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDonna Wilkinson / Marcy Walker vs Shannon Hinkle / Regan Jordan6-1, 6-1
2026-04-08vs Hagood55+3.5/METAWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnnette Clemons / Lisa Scherping vs Shannon Hinkle / Sarah LaGuardia6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMarcy Walker / Theresa Boyd vs Mary Warner / Holli Cox2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKimberly Keith / Pam Mobley vs Donna Morris / Carolyn Webb6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-02vs Hagood55+3.5/METAWon 30
W#1 DoublesGail Archer / Donna Wilkinson vs Anita Jilton / Shawn Dougherty6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKimberly Keith / Lisa Scherping vs Joan Hagood / Mary Warner6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTheresa Boyd / Sandra Cook vs Carolyn Webb / Lisa Hill6-2, 6-3
2026-03-26vs Hagood55+3.5/METAWon 21
L#1 DoublesDonna Wilkinson / Marcia Sentell vs Mary Warner / Holli Cox4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGail Archer / Robin Dimona vs Keo Jur / Anita Jilton6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTheresa Boyd / Sandra Cook vs Carolyn Webb / Sarah LaGuardia7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sentell/META5011410116
2Hagood55+3.5/META0541124167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Marcia Sentell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Annette Clemons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Gail Archer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Theresa Boyd
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Robin Dimona
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Pam Mobley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Kimberly Keith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Donna Wilkinson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Marcy Walker
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.22
Lisa Scherping
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Keith + Annette Clemons224 matchesnot enough data
Gail Archer + Donna Wilkinson213 matchesnot enough data
Gail Archer + Marcia Sentell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marcia Sentell
7W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Annette Clemons
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.54
Gail Archer
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
Theresa Boyd
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Robin Dimona
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Pam Mobley
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Kimberly Keith
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Donna Wilkinson
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Marcy Walker
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Lisa Scherping
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.