Teams

HFII RED

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 2.93 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-25vs EM REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAndrew Troyer / Brett Pugh vs Matthew Godley / Greg Eiselein1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJessi Andrews / Matthew Linnell vs Mark Leher / Andy Olree6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesGreg Mohrman vs Andy Wurst6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBradley Cole / John Hiner vs Mike Mohrman / Frank Pike1-6, 2-6
2026-05-21vs FOX GOLDWon 32
W#1 DoublesDavid Lowe / Greg Mohrman vs Jason Hayes / Lyle Olson6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMatthew Linnell vs Dave Anderson1-4
W#2 DoublesDonald Forest / Jessi Andrews vs Tim Haar / Zachary Hummel4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAndrew Troyer vs Scott Alvarez0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrian Perkins / Josh Haynes vs Scott Jones / Jeff Milanovich6-1, 6-4
2026-05-18vs WC GREENWon 30
W#2 DoublesAndrew Troyer / Jessi Andrews vs Doug Philpott / Troy Corrente7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesGreg Mohrman vs Charley Hoffmann6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJosh Haynes / Bradley Cole vs Patrick Gillen / Ethyn Feldman6-1, 6-2
2026-05-11vs HV REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDonald Forest / David Lowe vs Tim Boyer / Brian Nowlin2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrett Pugh / Chris Tomeo vs Travis Eide / Alex Purchase6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJessi Andrews vs Brett Wiesler4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBradley Cole / Andrew Troyer vs Joel Pehrson / Brandon Whalen6-3, 7-6
2026-04-27vs SKY NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesGreg Mohrman / Chris Tomeo vs Livingston Keithley / Jason Dewees6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDonald Forest / Brett Pugh vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMatthew Linnell vs Dan Almuti6-2, 6-4
2026-04-20vs EM REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesGreg Mohrman / Chris Tomeo vs Frank Pike / Andrew Erb6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMatthew Linnell vs Andy Wurst7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndrew Troyer / Brian Perkins vs Mike Mohrman / Andy Olree4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJessi Andrews vs Mark Leher0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDonald Forest / John Hiner vs Matthew Godley / Tim McWhite0-6, 2-6
2026-04-13vs WC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDonald Forest / David Lowe vs Samuel Weigand / Doug Philpott2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesGreg Mohrman vs Alex Cheng5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBradley Cole / Brett Pugh vs Michael Hines / Chris Kiker1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Hiner / Josh Haynes vs Charley Hoffmann / Patrick Gillen6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Greg Mohrman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.87
Andrew Troyer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.82
Brian Perkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Chris Tomeo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Bill Case
published 3
2.75
Jessi Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.74
Josh Haynes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Matthew Linnell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.67
Donald Forest
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.55
Brett Pugh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
John Hiner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Bradley Cole
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bradley Cole + John Hiner2349% games−2.3% vs expected
Chris Tomeo + Brett Pugh314 matchesnot enough data
Donald Forest + Andrew Troyer213 matchesnot enough data
Donald Forest + Bill Case033 matchesnot enough data
Josh Haynes + Bradley Cole123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Greg Mohrman
17W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Andrew Troyer
24W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Brian Perkins
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Chris Tomeo
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Bill Case
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jessi Andrews
6W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Josh Haynes
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
Matthew Linnell
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Donald Forest
38W–82L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Brett Pugh
5W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
John Hiner
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Bradley Cole
6W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.