Teams

Why Tri

2026 Tri-One Doubles League · 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-22vs HamajangLost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Bona / Jilbert Salamanca vs Gary Nacapuy / Bao Nguyen7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-08vs The Chiefs 4.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Pentecostes / Barry Ng vs Jan Carlo Egante / Glenn Gleason3-6, 3-6
2026-08-02vs JL Tennis 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRaynor Moux / Sean Balignasay vs Remii Tanaka / Sae Hyun Song6-7, 6-7
2026-08-01vs ExtraJuicyLuv 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesJason Bona / Jilbert Salamanca vs Jason Soileau / Bryson Rola7-5, 6-4
2026-07-21vs HamajangLost 01
L#1 DoublesSean Balignasay / Barry Ng vs Gary Nacapuy / Bao Nguyen3-2
2026-07-05vs The Chiefs 4.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesBarry Ng / Richard Pentecostes vs Ace-Kamakani Inouye / Kai Yoshida6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-28vs ExtraJuicyLuv 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesRaynor Moux / Jilbert Salamanca vs Angus Huang / Bryson Rola6-2, 7-6
2026-06-27vs JL Tennis 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Pentecostes / Sean Balignasay vs Jeffrey Lee / Remii Tanaka1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1JL Tennis 4.06060034
2Hamajang3232444
3The Chiefs 4.0M3333858
4Why Tri25251077
5ExtraJuicyLuv 4.015151063

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Jilbert Salamanca
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Jason Bona
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Sean Balignasay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Raynor Moux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Richard Pentecostes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Barry Ng
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Pentecostes + Sean Balignasay033 matchesnot enough data
Jilbert Salamanca + Raynor Moux303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jilbert Salamanca
195W–87L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Jason Bona
43W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Sean Balignasay
15W–31L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Raynor Moux
13W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Richard Pentecostes
79W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Barry Ng
66W–72L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.