Teams

Game Set Margs

2025 18 & OVER SPRING WEEKDAY WOMEN · 2.5 Women Friday

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-21vs TBD - Ashley FORCC 2.5 TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesLorin Sledge / Jordan Funk vs Kelsey McManus / Liesl Schuh6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCasey Beiland vs Ashley Kalmbach6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCara Voges / Celina Warren vs Dana Bisnov / Katherine Guerra6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Cayle Myers
published 3
2.84
Lorin Sledge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Cara Voges
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Casey Beiland
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.74
Jordan Funk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Emilie Kassner
published 3
2.64
2.62
Danielle Petty
published 3
2.54
Amanda Zars
published 3
2.46
Celina Warren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.43
Kendra Arambula
published
2.39
Kristen Bush
published
2.35
Leila Sirotiak
published
2.29
Samantha Wade
published
Margaux Huckabay
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Funk + Lorin Sledge5169% games+22.4% vs expected
Leila Sirotiak + Jordan Funk213 matchesnot enough data
Jordan Funk + Casey Beiland123 matchesnot enough data
Cara Voges + Celina Warren213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cayle Myers
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
Lorin Sledge
17W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.84
3
Cara Voges
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Casey Beiland
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
Jordan Funk
28W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%3%97%
2.74
3
Emilie Kassner
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Allison Mansfield
3W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
2.64
3
Danielle Petty
3W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Amanda Zars
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.54
3
Celina Warren
4W–4L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Kendra Arambula
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.43
Kristen Bush
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.39
Leila Sirotiak
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.35
Samantha Wade
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.29
Margaux Huckabay
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.