Teams

Cypress - Manibo

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Adult 18 & Over Fall ESL · 3.5 W Tuesday Eve

17 players · average NTRP 3.36 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-03vs Paseo-DingwallLost 03
L#1 DoublesVictoria Manietta / Christine Paraboschi vs Wendy Dingwall / Kelly Olson2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesNikki Tyndall vs Andrea Cooke2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarcia Disharoon / Angela Sterious vs Jill Hoffman / Denise Reynard6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2024-11-19vs ESL Fall Winner/UTC-MonahanLost 01
L#1 DoublesGwen Burdzy / Amy Marinell vs Melissa Dorr / Christina Candelario7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2024-11-11vs FMRC - SandersWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelly James / Amy Marinell vs Molly Hawkins / Deanne Kyle7-5, 6-1
2024-10-22vs Paseo-DingwallLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Wiles / Marilyn Kole vs Wendy Dingwall / Leticia Garcia7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesVictoria Manietta vs Amanda Patten3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElaine Kearney / Sara Manibo vs Beverly Gostomski / Becky Yance6-4, 6-3
2024-10-01vs FMRC - SandersWon 10
W#1 DoublesGwen Burdzy / Amy Marinell vs Nancy Sanders / Florentina Fessel6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Tuesday Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Amy Marinell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Sara Manibo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Kelly James
published
3.33
Gwen Burdzy
published 3.5
3.33
Tanya Sheffield
published
3.24
Marilyn Kole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Laurie Stewart
published
3.21
Diana Metzger
published 3.5
3.17
Victoria Manietta
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Christine Paraboschi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Nikki Tyndall
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.04
Christine Wiles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Marcia Disharoon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Elaine Kearney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Angela Sterious
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Karen Fiorillo
published
Patricia Highley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Stewart + Amy Marinell4455% games+9.3% vs expected
Laurie Stewart + Gwen Burdzy213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Marinell + Sara Manibo213 matchesnot enough data
Tanya Sheffield + Victoria Manietta303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Marinell
96W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
Sara Manibo
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
Kelly James
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Gwen Burdzy
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Tanya Sheffield
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Marilyn Kole
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Laurie Stewart
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Diana Metzger
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Victoria Manietta
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Christine Paraboschi
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Nikki Tyndall
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Christine Wiles
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Marcia Disharoon
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Elaine Kearney
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Angela Sterious
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Karen Fiorillo
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Highley
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.