Teams

LBK Public Schonhoff

2024 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · 8.0 W Monday

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_5

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-27vs LWR ZeiglerLost 02
L#1 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Martha Talyor vs Sheila Perry / Karen Nicholson5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHelen Turner / Margaret Stanton vs Betty Jo Zeigler / Diana Stadelnikas1-6, 3-6
2023-11-06vs LWR SosaLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Martha Talyor vs Hayley Englander / Jane Doe1-6, 6-7
2023-10-30vs SSC DavySplit 11
W#1 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Martha Talyor vs Roberta Smith / Lori Madden7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMargaret Stanton / Helen Turner vs Brenda Dechow / Cheryl Lyn2-6, 5-7
2023-10-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Martha Talyor vs Monica Darold / Tracey Hughes6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-02vs Payne Park SeiderLost 01
L#2 DoublesHelen Turner / Molly Gleason vs Laura Peters / Susan Marro2-6, 3-6
2023-09-25vs Waterford DuncanLost 01
L#1 DoublesHelen Turner / Lilia Johnson vs Constance Duncan / Carla Rodman1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Candice Sennecke
published 4
Jackie Gibbins
published 4
3.67
Mary Jane Waite
published
3.32
Gail Russell
published 3.5
3.32
Helen Turner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Molly Gleason
published
3.02
Ann Kelmenson
published 3.5
Karen Kurgan
published
Margaret Stanton
published
Sandy Schonhoff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sheliah Gruber
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Schonhoff + Helen Turner2350% gamesnot enough data
Gail Russell + Sheliah Gruber033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Candice Sennecke
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Jackie Gibbins
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Jane Waite
50W–38L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Gail Russell
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Helen Turner
34W–67L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
Molly Gleason
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Ann Kelmenson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
Karen Kurgan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Stanton
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandy Schonhoff
45W–65L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sheliah Gruber
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.