Teams

SAC-Robblee/Hays

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.12 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Kim Tellin
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.87
Kimbra Kasch
published 3
2.84
Kusum Mehndiratta
published 3
2.68
Jeane Anastas
published 3
Jeannette Martinez
published 0
Results6 ties
2022-11-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Tellin / Kusum Mehndiratta vs Linda Harrold / Judy Friedman6-2, 6-2
2022-11-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Tellin / Susan Elmer vs Donna Weyand / Tomoko Langworthy7-5, 6-1
2022-10-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Elmer / Kim Tellin vs Lynne Bowman / Dee Dee Elsey6-0, 6-3
2022-10-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Tellin / Susan Elmer vs Nicole Vedder / Chris van Leeuwen7-6, 6-3
2022-09-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Tellin / Diana Crawford vs Patries Ferguson / Barbara Gram4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Tellin / Kusum Mehndiratta vs Donna Weyand / Amy Hicks6-1, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Kim Tellin
110W–71L career
0%97%2%
3.37
3
Kimbra Kasch
40W–45L career
0%97%3%
2.87
3
Kusum Mehndiratta
20W–14L career
1%94%5%
2.84
3
Jeane Anastas
14W–31L career
4%96%0%
2.68
0
Jeannette Martinez
19W–19L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.