Teams

Burkwood Allen

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-11vs Westwood GilmanWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobin Booth / Diana Gary vs Holly Martin / Jennifer White6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMelissa Allen vs Britta Petersson6-3, 6-1
2025-06-09vs KRA- Fleck/WalekWon 20
W#1 SinglesMelissa Allen vs Mary Beth Scott7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRobin Booth / Catherine Sweeney vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-09vs Twin Hickory YuWon 20
W#1 SinglesMelissa Allen vs Deirdre Vaughan6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRobin Booth / Catherine Sweeney vs TONYA URQUHART / Jennifer Schwarz6-2, 6-2
2025-06-06vs Raintree WesthovenWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobin Booth / Karen Matthews vs Bridget Westhoven / Suzanne Martin6-2, 6-1
2025-06-04vs SCC CacciottiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRobin Booth / Diana Gary vs Cheryl Cacciotti / Sarah Boyd6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMelissa Allen vs Morgan Schwartz4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-23vs WOCC Kramer/VetterWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Allen / Robin Booth vs Sallie Mayer / Farrell Harwood6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-05-16vs Woodlake CookseyWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobin Booth / Catherine Sweeney vs Laurie Cooksey / Blanka White6-2, 7-6
2025-05-14vs SCC AndrewsWon 20
W#1 DoublesCynthia Muncy / Robin Booth vs Heather Benedetti / Kristin Kim2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMelissa Allen vs Michelle Scott6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Renee Culley
published
3.42
Robin Booth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.37
Cynthia Muncy
published 3.5
3.28
Melissa Allen
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.09
Lynne Moore
published
3.05
Tricia Jones
published
3.01
Diana Gary
published 3.5
3.00
2.88
Melina DeNunzio
published
2.83
DAYNA SCHOOLS
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Booth + Melissa Allen2347% games−0.7% vs expected
Catherine Sweeney + Cynthia Muncy314 matchesnot enough data
Renee Culley + Cynthia Muncy404 matchesnot enough data
Diana Gary + Lynne Moore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Renee Culley
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Robin Booth
87W–84L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Cynthia Muncy
16W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Melissa Allen
116W–116L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Lynne Moore
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.09
Tricia Jones
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Diana Gary
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Catherine Sweeney
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Melina DeNunzio
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
DAYNA SCHOOLS
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.