Teams

CCTA40/Achurch/TLC

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over · Adult Women - 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.10 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Kristin Lueken
published
3.93
Samantha Boyd
published
3.92
Lisa Lively
published
3.87
Laura Achurch
published
3.87
Tisha Chafer
published
3.85
Heather Galvin
published 4.5
3.84
Heidi Bristol
published 4
3.80
Julie Connoley
published
3.78
Deanna Childers
published 4
3.76
3.67
Carolyn Kraus
published 4
3.65
Kell Culclasure
published
3.60
Lola Bradshaw
published
3.60
Melissa Layman
published
Susie Morgan
published
Tammy Winslow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Willow Cooper + Julie Connoley7356% games+8.7% vs expected
Amy Willow Cooper + Melissa Layman13458% games+7.9% vs expected
Lola Bradshaw + Kell Culclasure6455% games+5.8% vs expected
Tammy Winslow + Deanna Childers7257% games−0.5% vs expected
Lola Bradshaw + Deanna Childers141548% games−6.9% vs expected
Amy Willow Cooper + Tammy Winslow134 matchesnot enough data
Amy Willow Cooper + Carolyn Kraus224 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Kraus + Kristin Lueken134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Lueken
43W–38L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.94
Samantha Boyd
21W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.93
Lisa Lively
51W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
Laura Achurch
31W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
Tisha Chafer
25W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4.5
Heather Galvin
24W–11L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.85
4
Heidi Bristol
39W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
Julie Connoley
40W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Deanna Childers
60W–32L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Amy Willow Cooper
101W–57L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Carolyn Kraus
62W–33L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Kell Culclasure
27W–17L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Lola Bradshaw
37W–35L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
Melissa Layman
21W–10L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
Susie Morgan
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tammy Winslow
33W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.