Teams

STC-Pirates-Ashcraft

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.46 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-19vs ETC-BursiekWon 21
L#1 DoublesChris Blakeslee / Christopher McReynolds vs Jeff Knudson / Matthew Ehrlichman5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMark de Vere White vs Scott Lennard6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndy Baker / Clayton Nielsen vs Tim Smith / Ryan Bussard6-0, 6-4
2022-03-12vs MI-LiWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Oaksmith / Bowman Neely vs Chenyang Li / Sanjiv Parikh6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndy Baker / John Ferry vs Christopher Dickinson / Dan Kalish6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChris Blakeslee / Jeff Feinstein vs Todd Seneker / Bharat Maheshwari6-2, 7-5
2022-03-06vs NTC-String Theory-BurnsWon 40
W#1 DoublesAndy Baker / Michael Oaksmith vs Eric Cobb / John Jacobsen6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMark de Vere White vs Kenneth Burns6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristopher McReynolds / Bowman Neely vs Todd Dunnington / Mike Mullen6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCraig Swanson / Patrick Brem vs Andy Rottler / Colin Williams7-5, 6-1
2022-02-26vs FC-General Mon CalpeSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDavid Ashcraft / John Ferry vs Bala Pedapalli / Stephane Perreault6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJeff Feinstein vs Ramon Calpe6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristopher McReynolds / Mark de Vere White vs Bong SantoDomingo / Edwin Carlos Sr2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJosh Stellick / Patrick Brem vs Michael Donnelly / U Yi6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-02-06vs CP-Gamma Squeeze-ViriththamullaWon 31
W#1 DoublesReilly Schanno / Chris Blakeslee vs Matt Rainey / Justin Marquart6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJeff Feinstein vs Sandeep Arora6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDavid Ashcraft / Daniel Flinn vs Alessandro Contenti / Jack Goldberg4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMichael Oaksmith / John Ferry vs Joseph Allison / Gamage Viriththamulla6-4, 6-1
2022-01-29vs MC-Red Hawks-VashistWon 21
W#1 DoublesReilly Schanno / David Ashcraft vs Munish Vashist / Greg Harriman7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Oaksmith / Bowman Neely vs Kevin Chung / Jeffrey Steele6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJosh Stellick / Christopher McReynolds vs Eisuke Nishi / Hazara Panesar2-6, 4-6
2022-01-23vs HBSQ-PolettiWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndy Baker / David Kosloff vs Kenny Kramer / Scott Chapman7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDavid Ashcraft / Reilly Schanno vs Bruce Adee / Gordon Williams4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJosh Stellick / Christopher McReynolds vs Ray Poletti / Joseph Gregory6-1, 7-5
2022-01-21vs WSC-Team Lash 3.5MLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Kosloff / Michael Oaksmith vs Rajesh Singh / Jeetu Thakur4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Ashcraft / Christopher McReynolds vs Jim Sternberg / Lin Chen0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJosh Stellick / Jeremy Blanchfield vs Calvin Vu / Ziran Lin1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings35 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RBW-Coe81261024283
2TCSP-Kotha81251128263
3CAC/SL-Wanat 3.5M7126617216
4MC-Red Hawks-Vashist7124821237
5MI-Wannabe's-Mattox7125725250
6AYTC-High Lobbers-Stoneberg72251126294
7TCSP-Sandbaggers-Kelley72231330269
8CP-Graves72251133299
9PL-Toki Highballers-Escalona6224823218
10WSC-Team Lash 3.5M62221030271
11BC-3.5 Camara 40+63261026285
12MI-Chen/Pae63261028265
13HBSQ-Poletti53211127270
14FC-General Mon Calpe53131941317
15STC-Skrobut54181840322
16STC-Pirates-Ashcraft44201226259
17ETC-Bursiek44131941289
18PL-Douglas45211535338
19EDG-Dickson45221438331
20PSC-Avengers-Kancherla45181839339
21CAC/SL-Recoil Reboot-Hanson45152148362
22CP-Wescott45152148351
23EDG-Bobcats 3.5 40+ Keller45152150357
24RBW-Avengers40-Ravi35161636308
25WSC-Iyer 3.5M35151738284
26PSC-Dacia-Frintu35102247328
27BETC-Wu 3.5M36132348353
28MC-Mens 3.5 Bluesmen-Ngo36122451365
29RTC-Roger that-Aggarwal26112146316
30CP-Gamma Squeeze-Viriththamulla26112146323
31NTC-String Theory-Burns2692348345
32ETC-TopSpinners-Ajoy 3.5M27112555371
33MI-Li17112145331
34BC-Sekins/Manning 40-3.50823060367
35WSC-2022-40+ Tennis is fun-Karmali0933368420

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Reilly Schanno
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Andy Baker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.39
Mark de Vere White
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.39
Scott Armstrong
published
3.34
Jeff Feinstein
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
David Kosloff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Chris Blakeslee
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Michael Oaksmith
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
John Ferry
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Clayton Nielsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
David Ashcraft
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Jeremy Blanchfield
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Christopher McReynolds
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.78
Patrick Brem
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.69
Craig Swanson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Josh Stellick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Ferry + Chris Blakeslee5460% games+8.5% vs expected
Andy Baker + David Kosloff5164% games+7.8% vs expected
John Ferry + Andy Baker7263% games+5.4% vs expected
David Ashcraft + Reilly Schanno16659% games+4.1% vs expected
Jeff Feinstein + Chris Blakeslee4161% games+4.0% vs expected
David Ashcraft + Andy Baker3353% games+3.2% vs expected
Jeff Feinstein + Christopher McReynolds6851% games+0.8% vs expected
Chris Blakeslee + Christopher McReynolds1441% games−3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Reilly Schanno
64W–19L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Andy Baker
65W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.54
3.5
Mark de Vere White
38W–18L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Scott Armstrong
49W–40L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
3.39
3.5
Jeff Feinstein
48W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
David Kosloff
55W–20L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Chris Blakeslee
59W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Michael Oaksmith
45W–10L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
John Ferry
60W–41L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Clayton Nielsen
12W–2L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3.5
David Ashcraft
35W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jeremy Blanchfield
45W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Christopher McReynolds
40W–60L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Patrick Brem
53W–32L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Craig Swanson
30W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Josh Stellick
5W–14L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.