← Teams

MPRC-Cronk/Adcock

2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Mike McNairy
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
3.88
Carrie Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Steve Bolstad
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.83
Kirsten Giacomini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
—
Quanwang Wei
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Sally Murdoch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Marie Picard
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.46
Rich Rice
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.05
Karen McNairy
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2025-05-17Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesSally Murdoch / Steve Bolstad vs Cindy Rushall / Hisayoshi Watanabe6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKaren McNairy / Mike McNairy vs Tina Clancy / Peter Schulte6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-05-10Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesBrian Jones / Marie Picard vs Robert Ferek / Liz DelPlato5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMike McNairy / Karen McNairy vs Tony Khamsouk / Tami Oglesby6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesQuanwang Wei / Carrie Fisher vs Scott Eliason / Crystal Bryant6-1, 6-0
2025-05-03Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMarie Picard / Brian Jones vs Emily McBride / Tom Lonergan3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKyoko Adcock / Quanwang Wei vs Karen Groenweghe / Jonathan Quon6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKirsten Giacomini / Rich Rice vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Jack Schunk vs Minou Chau / Stephen Crook6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKaren McNairy / Mike McNairy vs Tina Clancy / Hisayoshi Watanabe6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKyoko Adcock / Steve Bolstad vs Daniel Lamey / Julie Carmena7-5, 6-3
2025-04-11Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSteve Bolstad / Sally Murdoch vs Karen Groenweghe / Jonathan Quon3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren McNairy / Mike McNairy vs Tony Solivan / Christine Wall7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Rich Rice vs Kris Kelly-Koster / Craig Mills4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMarie Picard / Jack Schunk vs Michelle Jobe / Robert Ferek6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren McNairy / Mike McNairy vs Carol Devencenzi / Frank Olson6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKyoko Adcock / Steve Bolstad vs Liz DelPlato / Len Morales6-1, 7-6
2025-03-30Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKaren McNairy / Mike McNairy vs Lily Looi / Neil Soiffer4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarie Picard / Jack Schunk vs Julie Hanson / Mike Hyne6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Quanwang Wei vs Carla Wheeler / Shawn Boyce6-2, 7-6
2025-03-23Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMarie Picard / Steve Bolstad vs Antoinette Ann Reno / Soren Coughlin-Glaser6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren McNairy / Mike McNairy vs Lisa Lyon / James Ringelberg7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSally Murdoch / Brian Jones vs Libby North / Chris Thoman6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Mike McNairy
62W–56L career
6%94%0%
4.06
4
Carrie Fisher
135W–80L career
0%97%3%
3.88
4
Steve Bolstad
67W–44L career
0%97%3%
3.85
4
Kirsten Giacomini
93W–48L career
0%97%3%
3.83
4
Quanwang Wei
31W–22L career
not enough data
—
4
Sally Murdoch
42W–35L career · type M
5%93%2%
3.75
4
Marie Picard
128W–96L career
18%82%0%
3.57
4
Rich Rice
65W–70L career
45%55%0%
3.46
3.5
Karen McNairy
49W–62L career
21%79%0%
3.05

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.