Teams

Beck- Voice Let- Woodlands Parks

*2026 Adult Combo 6.5- 9.5 NoHo Women · 6.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 6 played
Sep 9 9:00 AM
Cranebrook Park
Sep 16 9:00 AM
Cranebrook Park
2026-08-26vs Battle-Lucky Strings-Woodlands ParksSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDebbi Bourbonnais / Lizeth Carrera vs Shannon Speer / Rebecca Barrett5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Witt / Rhenalea Beck vs Kelly King / Wendy Liddell6-1, 7-6
2026-08-19vs Vogel-Alley Cats-BentwaterLost 02
L#2 DoublesJackie Burns / Susan Witt vs Donna Griffith / Diana LaDoe6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Haag / April Hopkins vs Martha Vogel / Nicole Antonvich1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesAimee Shepherd / Jackie Burns vs Amy Karins / Jennifer Breckon2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 DoublesSusan Witt / Andrea Escobar vs Shelly-Jo Shuman / Hillary Zuniga6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAngela Carroway / Lizeth Carrera vs Nicole Luca / Lisa Arvizu0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Haag / Laura Toomey vs Courtney O'Mahoney / Tara Brengel2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Toomey / Lizeth Carrera vs Rebecca Barrett / Jennie Hughes0-6, 1-6
2026-07-21vs Vogel-Alley Cats-BentwaterWon 20
W#1 DoublesJackie Burns / Susan Witt vs Donna Griffith / Maria Nelson7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAndrea Escobar / Monica Barnett vs Sarah Redfield / Nicole Antonvich6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1O'Mahoney-Set To Win-Woodlands Parks419615121
2Breckon-Wild Aces-Walden on Lake Conroe329618147
3Battle-Lucky Strings-Woodlands Parks22751086
4Vogel-Alley Cats-Bentwater236920149
5Beck- Voice Let- Woodlands Parks1451020145

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Aimee Shepherd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Lizeth Carrera
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Monica Barnett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Angela Carroway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jennifer Haag
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Witt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aimee Shepherd
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Lizeth Carrera
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Monica Barnett
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Angela Carroway
1W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
Jennifer Haag
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Witt
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.