Teams

SSH YELLOW

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-19vs HW REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Freestone / Toni Chalmers vs Shelly Russell / Kim Lyons6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDorothy Carr vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKellie Naclerio / Stacie Sonius vs Brianna Gass / Laurie McElroy6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRenee Krause / Kelly Callister vs Ashley Pennick / Allison Barker6-2, 6-1
2022-07-12vs HV BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesToni Chalmers / Elizabeth Freestone vs Anna Larsen / Elena Ellcessor4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKelly Callister vs Danielle Kennedy4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKellie Naclerio / Stacie Sonius vs Leslie Moody / Charlotte Brady6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCatherine Zeberlein / Dorothy Carr vs Carol Bryant / Linda Sjoberg6-1, 6-2
2022-07-05vs HFII REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Freestone / Stacie Sonius vs Su Zemla / Katie Ross5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRenee Krause vs Maren Plisko1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Zeberlein / Dorothy Carr vs Angela Hansen / Danielle Drohan4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKellie Naclerio / Kelly Callister vs Maria Shea / Rachel Nance6-1, 6-3
2022-06-28vs KC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesKellie Naclerio / Stacie Sonius vs Danielle Steadman / Christi Hursta6-4, 4-5
L#1 SinglesRenee Krause vs Amy Murphy1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Freestone / Toni Chalmers vs Kathy Owens / Kathleen Rose6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCatherine Zeberlein / Dorothy Carr vs Holly Sharpeta / Elise Gale6-1, 6-2
2022-06-21vs HG TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Freestone / Toni Chalmers vs Debbie Lepetsos / Kerrie Bentfield6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesStacie Sonius vs Katie Johnson6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCatherine Zeberlein / Dorothy Carr vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-14vs WC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKellie Naclerio / Stacie Sonius vs Emily Lewis / Juli Simmermon3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKelly Callister vs Jenny Yotter6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCatherine Zeberlein / Toni Chalmers vs Melissa Cabeceiras / Whitney Baylor6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Tengler / Elizabeth Freestone vs Karen Steketee / Arijana Barun6-7, 6-7
2022-06-07vs LTFC REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesKellie Naclerio / Stacie Sonius vs Lisa Lash / Jill Nelson6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDorothy Carr vs Jennifer Loehr6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Freestone / Toni Chalmers vs Amy Shearer / Rebecca McIlwaine6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCatherine Zeberlein / Renee Krause vs Jenna Sellers / Alena Sukhovetskyy6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Elizabeth Freestone
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.06
Stacie Sonius
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.05
Catherine Zeberlein
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Toni Chalmers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Kelly Callister
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Dorothy Carr
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Kellie Naclerio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Renee Krause
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Clairissa Jolley
published
Erin Jensen
published
Nancy Tengler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Toni Chalmers + Elizabeth Freestone13264% games+11.8% vs expected
Dorothy Carr + Elizabeth Freestone10360% games+6.4% vs expected
Stacie Sonius + Kellie Naclerio421758% games+4.0% vs expected
Dorothy Carr + Catherine Zeberlein191160% games+2.8% vs expected
Stacie Sonius + Catherine Zeberlein131152% games−0.3% vs expected
Kellie Naclerio + Catherine Zeberlein171354% games−0.9% vs expected
Kellie Naclerio + Dorothy Carr0529% games−15.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Freestone + Catherine Zeberlein5161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Freestone
163W–103L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Stacie Sonius
86W–43L career · 7 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Catherine Zeberlein
165W–97L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Toni Chalmers
72W–52L career · 6 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
Kelly Callister
72W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Dorothy Carr
125W–82L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Kellie Naclerio
121W–72L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
Renee Krause
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
Clairissa Jolley
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Erin Jensen
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Tengler
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.