Teams

4-TBuckley-CHTC

2022 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-11vs 1-DStefan-HSWon 10
W#1 DoublesBob Stocking / Doug Kopec vs Eric Lindblom / Craig Demarest7-5, 7-5
2022-04-20vs 1-DStefan-HSWon 10
W#2 DoublesGary Glish / Bob Stocking vs David Stefan / Dave Thomas7-6, 7-6
2022-04-13vs 3-SClark-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesWendell Gilland / Gary Glish vs Glen Hacker / Frank Veno6-2, 6-0
2022-04-06vs 2-RGildehaus-YMCAWon 10
W#1 DoublesWendell Gilland / Doug Kopec vs Ralph Gildehaus / Stephen Rothchild7-6, 7-5
2022-03-29vs 3-SClark-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesDoug Kopec / Timothy Buckley vs Bert Clancey / Glen Hacker7-6, 6-4
2022-03-03vs 2-RGildehaus-YMCAWon 10
W#2 DoublesGary Glish / Doug Kopec vs Mark McCullough / Derek Saccoccio6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Wendell Gilland
published
3.33
Dan Tudor
published 3.5
3.30
Gary Glish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Doug Kopec
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Timothy Buckley
published
3.25
Bob Stocking
published 3.5
3.22
Mark Higuchi
published
3.14
Steve Dischinger
published
3.09
Richard Goldberg
published
2.92
Robert Kern
published
Stephen Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug Kopec + Gary Glish18662% games+5.8% vs expected
Timothy Buckley + Gary Glish303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendell Gilland
24W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
3.5
Dan Tudor
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Gary Glish
141W–124L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Doug Kopec
82W–58L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
Timothy Buckley
32W–19L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Bob Stocking
18W–19L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Mark Higuchi
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Steve Dischinger
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
Richard Goldberg
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Robert Kern
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
2.92
Stephen Ryan
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.