Teams

JTC - Madorsky/Godwin

2023 Alachua Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-30vs ALACHUA/Almond/40&Over4.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlison Andrus / Peggi Bockman vs Caroline Hord / Tara Edelstein4-6, 6-7
2023-04-22vs ALACHUA/Almond/40&Over4.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesCynthia Thibault / Alison Andrus vs Caroline Hord / Tara Edelstein6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2023-04-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCynthia Thibault / Alison Andrus vs Dorie Frum / Marla Ambrose1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-04-07vs ALACHUA/Almond/40&Over4.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesPeggi Bockman / Alison Andrus vs Anne Billion / Debbie Bowers7-6, 6-4
2023-04-06vs ALACHUA/Almond/40&Over4.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlison Andrus / Peggi Bockman vs Susan Benton / Wheeler Crawford6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMarlene Townsend vs Anne Billion1-6, 1-6
2023-03-25vs ALACHUA/Almond/40&Over4.0WLost 02
L#1 SinglesMarlene Townsend vs Anne Billion1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLynn Godwin / Irina Madorsky vs Dorie Frum / Heather Gibson2-6, 2-6
2023-03-09vs ALACHUA/Almond/40&Over4.0WLost 02
L#1 SinglesIrina Madorsky vs Frances Revere3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTammy Miller / Marlene Townsend vs TARA BROMIRSKI / Tara Edelstein7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Alison Andrus
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.81
Jordan Davis
published
3.79
Tammy Miller
published
Cynthia Thibault
published 4
3.64
Lynn Godwin
published
3.50
Terry West
published
3.42
Irina Madorsky
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 4
3.29
Marlene Townsend
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Peggi Bockman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Valerie de Crecy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggi Bockman + Alison Andrus4352% gamesnot enough data
Marlene Townsend + Irina Madorsky123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alison Andrus
79W–67L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.84
Jordan Davis
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.81
Tammy Miller
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Cynthia Thibault
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynn Godwin
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Terry West
8W–19L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Irina Madorsky
222W–180L career · 7 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.42
Marlene Townsend
181W–153L career · 10 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Peggi Bockman
30W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Valerie de Crecy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.