Teams

Shadid/SH

2024 TUL ADULT 18 & Over League · 3.5 WOMEN

19 players · average NTRP 3.42 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-29vs Walker/GRWon 32
W#1 DoublesTerry Largent / Cyndy Phillips vs Andrea Walker / Shannon Faulkner1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCindy Marshall vs Eden Evans6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAilee Nowlin / TJ Warren vs Tracie Wilson / Anna Quick6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAnnatina Aaronson vs Trisha Millington7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaurie Wollmershauser / Julie Wood vs Kay Jones / Denise Whitten4-6, 4-6
2024-05-15vs Coffey/PHLost 14
L#1 DoublesHolly Lamb / Megan Gawey vs Michelle Dickason / Tina Moody3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCyndy Phillips vs Chloe Coffey6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMartha Shadid / Ailee Nowlin vs Jill Gulick / Ginger Coffey6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKatie Arens vs Caroline Kelly5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Marshall / Laurie Wollmershauser vs Haven Willis / Karen Young2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-08vs Gilbert/LFWon 31
W#1 DoublesJulee Mabrey / Holly Lamb vs Elizabeth Bell / Allison Denning6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMegan Gawey / Martha Shadid vs Arletta Sloan / Lynette Thurman6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKristin Hook vs Kelsey Neal3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTJ Warren / Annatina Aaronson vs Adria Sanditen / Abby Kurin6-0, 6-1
2024-05-01vs Green 1: Irby/LFLost 14
W#1 DoublesTerry Largent / Cyndy Phillips vs Cindy Crowder / Iris Griffin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristin Hook vs Dana Dudley5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Raschen / Johnna Walker vs Beth Scruggs / Emilee Irby2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAilee Nowlin vs Amanda Kilian1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesZahidah Hyman / Dee Ann Beal vs Michelle Pryer / Whitney Jessee5-7, 2-6
2024-04-23vs Lilly/LFLost 23
W#1 DoublesKristin Hook / Holly Lamb vs Cheryl Sumners / Lori Buechler6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTJ Warren vs Kelly Stalb5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Marshall / Martha Shadid vs Tricia Riggs / Amber Reynolds6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJulee Mabrey vs Brandi Phillips3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJohnna Walker / Kathy Raschen vs Julie Prox / Jentry Workman4-6, 3-6
2024-04-17vs Green 2: Phillips/LFLost 05
L#1 DoublesCindy Marshall / Megan Gawey vs Sharna Bovasso / Tiffany Steinke6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristin Hook vs Janet Crockett6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnnatina Aaronson / Zahidah Hyman vs Cheryl Willis / Bobbi Jo Gibson6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKatie Arens vs Stephanie Kolman0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTJ Warren / Ailee Nowlin vs Candy Phillips / Jennifer Carroll7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-11vs Celestain/LFWon 32
W#1 DoublesTerry Largent / Cyndy Phillips vs Petrina Holloway / Rebekah Herrick6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAnnatina Aaronson vs Trina Lolato7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCindy Marshall / Martha Shadid vs Casandra Celestain / Monica Mitchell6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJohnna Walker vs Patricia Doerr5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Arens / Julie Wood vs Traci Hazel / Traci Ladner5-7, 5-7
2024-04-03vs Duncan/TTCLost 14
L#1 DoublesZahidah Hyman / Megan Gawey vs Jennifer Cook / Heather Duncan3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKatie Arens vs Adele Beasley Weaver0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Lamb / Martha Shadid vs Haley Schroedter / Colleen Mordhorst1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesCyndy Phillips vs Terrie Shipley6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDee Ann Beal / Laurie Wollmershauser vs Karen Freudenrich / Judith Allen3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 3.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tulsa Night: Mitchell/LF8031922261
2Green 1: Irby/LF71301028297
3Green 2: Phillips/LF71291134324
4Orange 2: Sidorakis/SH62251534316
5Howerton/LF53261430296
6Grotts/IS53231744337
7Lilly/LF44182251392
8Celestain/LF35211944346
9Coffey/PH35211948377
10Shadid/SH35152554404
11Harp/PH26122861405
12Spencer/LF17132758416
13Walker/GR17122859408
14Crockett/GR0893164412

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
TJ Warren
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Cindy Marshall
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.33
Cyndy Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Terry Largent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Megan Gawey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Kristin Hook
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
Ailee Nowlin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Zahidah Hyman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Holly Lamb
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Martha Shadid
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Julee Mabrey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.06
Annatina Aaronson
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Kathy Raschen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Johnna Walker
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Dee Ann Beal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Laurie Wollmershauser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Katie Arens
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #1 Singles 18% · published
Julie Wood
published
Liz Marchand
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Arens + Ailee Nowlin5160% games+8.2% vs expected
Martha Shadid + Julee Mabrey3255% games+4.8% vs expected
Holly Lamb + Julee Mabrey9360% games+4.7% vs expected
Martha Shadid + Holly Lamb4255% games+3.1% vs expected
Martha Shadid + Cindy Marshall15262% games+2.7% vs expected
Johnna Walker + Kathy Raschen181151% games+1.4% vs expected
Terry Largent + Zahidah Hyman6748% games+1.2% vs expected
Julie Wood + Kathy Raschen10557% games+1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

TJ Warren
128W–68L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Cindy Marshall
120W–77L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Cyndy Phillips
97W–57L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
Terry Largent
100W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Megan Gawey
28W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
Kristin Hook
75W–48L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Ailee Nowlin
23W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Zahidah Hyman
59W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Holly Lamb
24W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
Martha Shadid
47W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.13
Julee Mabrey
42W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Annatina Aaronson
59W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
Kathy Raschen
69W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Johnna Walker
28W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Dee Ann Beal
18W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laurie Wollmershauser
17W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
Katie Arens
70W–65L career · 11 lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
2.65
Julie Wood
25W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Liz Marchand
28W–35L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.