Teams

Inverness - Kozlowski/Lancaster

2023 B'ham Spring - 18 & Over Women Weekday · 3.5 Women Friday

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Rebecca Mathis
published
3.26
Rebecca Sandidge
published
3.17
Nancy Kallus
published
3.15
Lauri Derecki
published
3.13
Suzanne Einfalt
published
3.10
Lauren Kozlowski
published
3.06
Jennifer Lancaster
published
3.04
Lee Kauper
published
3.02
Colleen Ruszkowski
published 3.5
2.60
Cindy Hodo
published 3
Julianna Hill
published
Kristin Whitehurst
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Einfalt + Lauri Derecki1543% games−0.2% vs expected
Lauren Kozlowski + Lauri Derecki3249% games−8.5% vs expected
Suzanne Einfalt + Jennifer Lancaster303 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Sandidge + Lauren Kozlowski033 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Lancaster + Lauri Derecki123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Mathis
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
Rebecca Sandidge
22W–23L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Nancy Kallus
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Lauri Derecki
20W–26L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Suzanne Einfalt
17W–30L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
Lauren Kozlowski
14W–25L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Jennifer Lancaster
10W–24L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Lee Kauper
4W–24L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Colleen Ruszkowski
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.02
3
Cindy Hodo
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
2.60
Julianna Hill
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristin Whitehurst
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.