Teams

Glenview Perkins

2026 Marion Adult 55 & Over Winter · 7.0 W Sunday

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-08vs SkyviewWon 21
L#1 DoublesRobin Lancaster / Marcia Plante vs Rita Meek / Carol Hirsch4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMarilu Burden / Diane Cassidy vs Tracy Shisler / Henny David6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDina Sapienza / Patricia James vs Tana Hubbard / Carmen Rosengarten6-1, 6-3
2026-03-01vs Glenview Village Volley GirlsLost 12
L#1 DoublesDina Sapienza / Marcia Plante vs Sandy Shapiro / Ann-Marie Chouinard4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSally Perkins / Diane Cassidy vs Lisa Lee / Margaret Mis6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobin Lancaster / Robin Zink vs Elizabeth Bosco / Susie Day1-6, 0-6
2026-02-22vs Marion/HaynesLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobin Lancaster / Maricel Keiter vs Julie Haynes / Hera Peterson4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSally Perkins / Patricia James vs Carol Mecca / Suteera Chaisumrej Joyce3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDiane Cassidy / Catherine Sersen vs Donna Jarvis / Kristin Milbrandt6-2, 6-2
2026-02-15vs FK Queens of the CourtLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatricia James / Dina Sapienza vs Jane Kaul / Gwen Ehler6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMarilu Burden / Kim Ligon vs Georgina Bumpas / Susan Atwell2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMarcia Plante / Robin Zink vs Kim Arcobello / Josephine Robinson6-3
2026-02-14vs SkyviewLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Cassidy / Catherine Sersen vs Tracy Shisler / Beatrice Barlet3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaria AnneDiOrio / Marilu Burden vs Irma Buttermore / Maureen Maloney6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSally Perkins / Maricel Keiter vs Henny David / Tana Hubbard3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-08vs FK 55+ 7.0 GREENE TEAMLost 03
L#1 DoublesSally Perkins / Maria AnneDiOrio vs Gina Dell / Diane Johnston3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMaricel Keiter / Marilu Burden vs Janet Greene / Terri Lowery5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Zink / Patricia James vs Jennifer Halinski / Rhonda Lane4-6, 3-6
2026-02-06vs FK WalshWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaricel Keiter / Marilu Burden vs Natalie Petsche / Carmen Rosario6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDiane Cassidy / Catherine Sersen vs Jan Cole / Michelle Broder6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSally Perkins / Robin Lancaster vs Marianne Marcoux / Barbara Slatton2-6, 4-6
2026-01-25vs Glenview Village Volley GirlsLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Sersen / Sally Perkins vs Mary Meek / Mime Ichini-Lurie1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaria AnneDiOrio / Kim Ligon vs Michelle Nathan / Julie Davidson2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMarilu Burden / Maricel Keiter vs Judy Hoops / Ann-Marie Chouinard6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Dina Sapienza
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Diane Cassidy
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.32
Catherine Sersen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Robin Zink
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Maricel Keiter
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.93
Patricia James
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kim Ligon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marcia Plante
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Maria AnneDiOrio
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Marilu Burden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Robin Lancaster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sally Perkins
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Sersen + Diane Cassidy8264% gamesnot enough data
Marilu Burden + Maricel Keiter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dina Sapienza
8W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Diane Cassidy
13W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Catherine Sersen
8W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Robin Zink
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Maricel Keiter
5W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Patricia James
98W–75L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Kim Ligon
23W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marcia Plante
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maria AnneDiOrio
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marilu Burden
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robin Lancaster
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sally Perkins
3W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.