Teams

YMCA TNT-Nankivel

2024 Fredericksburg Adult 18 & Over · Fredericksburg Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-02vs Battlefield Ball Busters-FordSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKeyona Bell / Dorota Sipko vs Frances Bouffard / Carrie Seifert3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRachael Day / Teresa Wallendjack vs Leslie Caliri / Lorrie Roberts7-6, 6-0
2024-05-11vs Battlefield Ball Busters-FordSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTanya Gossett / Tara O'Brien vs Leslie Caliri / Lorrie Roberts3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDorota Sipko / Keyona Bell vs Joan Donoghue / Kathryn Davis6-1, 6-1
2024-04-25vs FCC Tie Breakers-BlakemoreSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDorota Sipko / Lisa Alpert vs Judith Jobrack / Megan Roberge6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAdele Granger / Teresa Wallendjack vs Dana Schuster / Telly Salafia3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-04-21vs Battlefield Ball Busters-FordLost 02
L#2 DoublesTracey Nankivel / Tanya Gossett vs Debbie Kem / Elaine Brissette2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTara O'Brien / Dorota Sipko vs Mary Jane Wooldridge / Carrie Seifert1-6, 1-6
2024-04-04vs Battlefield Ball Busters-FordLost 02
L#1 DoublesCynthia Robinson / Teresa Wallendjack vs Leslie Caliri / Lorrie Roberts3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRachael Day / Dorota Sipko vs Joan Donoghue / Debbie Kem7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Keyona Bell
published
3.36
Tanya Gossett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Dorota Sipko
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Jamie Stokes
published 3.5
3.06
Cynthia Robinson
published 3.5
3.01
Teresa Wallendjack
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Lisa Alpert
published
2.74
Jamie Mcneill
published 3
2.69
Kristina Smithson
published
Rachael Day
published
Tracey Nankivel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dorota Sipko + Teresa Wallendjack2350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keyona Bell
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.63
3.5
Tanya Gossett
39W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Dorota Sipko
163W–91L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Jamie Stokes
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Cynthia Robinson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Teresa Wallendjack
63W–89L career · 3 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.01
Lisa Alpert
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Jamie Mcneill
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
Kristina Smithson
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Rachael Day
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracey Nankivel
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.