Teams

RMTC NAVY

2022 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-07vs CVTA BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Hensley / Meaghan Spiegel vs Shaun Howe / Rashmi Anki4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCara Hoving vs Alicia Miller6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTamny Costello / Tracey McCoy vs Emily Vigmostad / Steffani Hafner6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2022-09-01vs BCC GOLDLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnn Hensley / Robin Noble vs Melissa Ondash / Susan Hirano4-6, 6-7
2022-08-24vs LTA GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesTamny Costello / Ann Hensley vs Erika Cistone / Emma West2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCara Hoving vs Paige Schauermann6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJackie Rosenberg / Meaghan Spiegel vs Tammy Duerksen / Lindsay Roland4-6, 6-7
2022-08-23vs BRMST GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesTamny Costello / Cara Hoving vs Kelly Horace / Jody Knaley7-5, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJackie Rosenberg vs Micheline Gardner5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMeaghan Spiegel / Christa Smith vs Wendy Kuhna / Tracy Klein1-6, 0-6
2022-08-10vs BTA NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Hensley / Robin Noble vs Eva Raschke / Kate Resnick1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCara Hoving vs Kathleen Fitzcallaghan6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTracey McCoy / Christa Smith vs Marla Terwilliger / Emily Koechel1-6, 1-6
2022-08-05vs TTA SILVERLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Hensley / Jackie Rosenberg vs Summer Smith / Tracy Wiske6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCara Hoving vs Shonee Lesh6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCynthia Stadd Orvis / Sandra Walker vs Carey Price / Karen Walter2-6, 3-6
2022-07-27vs CVTA REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesJackie Rosenberg / Meaghan Spiegel vs Nina Rodd / Maggie Brubaker2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCara Hoving vs Louise Fowler6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCynthia Stadd Orvis / Sandra Walker vs Helen Sommer / Nancy Stern0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Cara Hoving
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.33
Meaghan Spiegel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Ann Hensley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Cynthia Stadd Orvis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jackie Rosenberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.74
Tamny Costello
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.44
Robin Noble
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tracey McCoy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Hensley + Cara Hoving5160% games+8.7% vs expected
Tamny Costello + Tracey McCoy51043% games+7.2% vs expected
Ann Hensley + Tamny Costello3447% games+1.1% vs expected
Meaghan Spiegel + Ann Hensley7652% games−1.5% vs expected
Tamny Costello + Cara Hoving314 matchesnot enough data
Tamny Costello + Robin Noble314 matchesnot enough data
Meaghan Spiegel + Tamny Costello123 matchesnot enough data
Ann Hensley + Robin Noble033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cara Hoving
97W–38L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
3.5
Meaghan Spiegel
53W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3
Ann Hensley
48W–41L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Cynthia Stadd Orvis
22W–23L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Jackie Rosenberg
8W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Tamny Costello
44W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74
Robin Noble
25W–48L career · 2 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.44
Tracey McCoy
9W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.