Teams

3-SHarvey-Eno

2022 Eno River Mixed 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult Mixed 7.0 Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-08vs 1-VHIGUCHI-CHTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLori Hatlen / Roger Hatlen vs Virginia Higuchi / Mark Higuchi7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMary Parker / Stephen Rothchild vs Lynne Farber / Mark Farber4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-07-20vs 2-KReedy-EnoWon 10
W#3 DoublesScott Beddingfield / Kit Carson vs Philip Sweigart / Nancy Sickel7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-06vs 1-VHIGUCHI-CHTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesLori Hatlen / Roger Hatlen vs Mark Higuchi / Virginia Higuchi6-2, 6-3
2022-06-29vs 2-KReedy-EnoWon 30
W#1 DoublesLori Hatlen / Roger Hatlen vs Chris Konvalinka / Laura Webb-Murrah6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMary Parker / Stephen Rothchild vs Jeff Reedy / Jennifer Hoffmann6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKit Carson / Scott Beddingfield vs Philip Sweigart / Nancy Sickel4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-20vs 2-KReedy-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesLori Hatlen / Roger Hatlen vs Jennifer Crawford / Philip Sweigart6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Parker / Stephen Rothchild vs Eric Lindblom / Kathy Reedy6-4, 6-3
2022-06-15vs 1-VHIGUCHI-CHTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesKit Carson / Scott Beddingfield vs Virginia Higuchi / Mark Higuchi6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusana Harvey / Allen Chan vs Denise Corey / John Corey6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult Mixed 7.0 Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Roger Hatlen
published
3.77
Susana Harvey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.69
Lori Hatlen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Scott Beddingfield
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.24
Stephen Rothchild
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Janice Clayton
published
2.83
Kathryn Chan
published
Kit Carson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roger Hatlen + Lori Hatlen1943% games−14.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roger Hatlen
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
3.5
Susana Harvey
402W–157L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%2%98%
3.77
4
Lori Hatlen
137W–170L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Scott Beddingfield
64W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Stephen Rothchild
62W–60L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Janice Clayton
19W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
Kathryn Chan
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Kit Carson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.