← Teams

SHC-Francis/Minor

2019 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Linda Mertz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Kathleen Francis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results7 ties
2019-05-17Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJanice Thomas / Kathleen Francis vs Sanae Ito / Cheryl Lolich6-1, 6-0
2019-05-16Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesNoriko Dozono / Linda Mertz vs Patricia Morrison / Barbara Pasmore6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2019-05-02Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesLinda Mertz / Noriko Dozono vs Carol Bietsch / Willemina Niosi6-1, 6-3
2019-04-22Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesLinda Mertz / Patricia Campbell vs Mary Ganji / Suzy Carton6-4, 6-3
2019-04-12Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Hellen-Halfen / Kathleen Francis vs Judy Orlandini / Diana Miller7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2019-04-04Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesCary Strauch / Kathleen Francis vs Sherrie Barger / Margo Reifenrath7-5, 7-6
2019-03-25Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Evans / Kathleen Francis vs Shelley Kolb / Kathi Gray6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLinda Mertz / Peggy Casebeer vs Susan Lindahl / Susan Lively6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Linda Mertz
19W–20L career
not enough data
—
3
Kathleen Francis
16W–12L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.