Teams

CP:Double the Fun:Curry/Conger

2023 VT Tri-Level Women · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 2.50 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-12vs OC:Our Court Jesters:DurstinLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Curry / Lisa Conger vs Lisa Durstin / Amy Dexter0-6, 1-6
2023-11-11vs EE:BABs:Sinopoli/DurieuxLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaphne Dulude / Carrie McAdoo vs Lori Durieux / Nicole Hansen2-6, 1-6
2023-11-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Curry / Daphne Dulude vs Karen Smith / Jacqueline Heitner2-6, 1-6
2023-10-29vs ESB:Penn Pals:NorotskyLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Conger / Lisa Curry vs Kate Cunningham / Jacqueline Heitner0-6, 1-6
2023-10-21vs OC:Our Court Jesters:DurstinLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Curry / Carrie McAdoo vs Lisa Durstin / Elizabeth Maislen0-6, 0-6
2023-10-15vs ESB:Double Trouble:Merrill/SmithLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Conger / Lisa Curry vs Lisa Merrill / Maja Smith2-6, 1-6
2023-10-07vs ESB:Double Trouble:Merrill/SmithLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Conger / Carrie McAdoo vs Liza Webster / Evelyn Norris0-6, 3-6
2023-09-30vs EE:BABs:Sinopoli/DurieuxLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Curry / Daphne Dulude vs Nicole Hansen / Marsha Weisfeld1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OC:Our Court Jesters:Durstin8080236
2EE:BABs:Sinopoli/Durieux5353654
3ESB:Double Trouble:Merrill/Smith5353866
4ESB:Penn Pals:Norotsky26261275
5CP:Double the Fun:Curry/Conger08081696

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carrie McAdoo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Daphne Dulude
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lisa Conger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Curry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Conger + Lisa Curry033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Carrie McAdoo
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Daphne Dulude
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Conger
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Curry
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.