Teams

BHSC- Johnson

2025 Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-23vs Sanford - Forest LakesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJannemieke Keener / Lisa Manley vs Mary Manley / Terry Roberts7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Dunn / Wendi Ruschmann vs Tracy Burpee / Caroline Childers6-3, 6-2
2025-07-07vs Merrick - KeswickWon 10
W#2 DoublesWendi Ruschmann / Jessicah Collins vs Amelia Black / Cailin Collier6-1, 6-4
2025-06-30vs Glenmore- EgidiLost 01
L#3 DoublesJannemieke Keener / Jessicah Collins vs Stephanie Levin / Pam Socolow6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-06-27vs BHSC - Racket Science-JordanLost 02
L#2 DoublesWendi Ruschmann / Susan Park vs Abbie Oliver / Lindy Kastendike6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJannemieke Keener / Lisa Manley vs Linda Jordan / Pascale Hapgood3-6, 4-6
2025-06-16vs ACAC Terminetters-MeyerWon 10
W#2 DoublesWendi Ruschmann / Jessicah Collins vs Esther Bausserman / Samantha Bates6-1, 6-4
W#1 DoublesWendi Ruschmann / Laura Pietro vs Shannon Mrazik / Dianna Gibson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Polly Hunter
published
2.99
Esther Cho
published
2.85
Maritza Johnson
published
2.85
Patricia Irby
published
2.85
Susan Park
published
2.83
Jannemieke Keener
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Gretchen Masselli
published
2.74
Wendi Ruschmann
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
Lisa Manley
published
2.60
Jessicah Collins
published
2.57
Akanksha Meyer
published 3
2.53
Susie Jones
published
Laura Pietro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jannemieke Keener + Wendi Ruschmann9954% games+7.8% vs expected
Susan Park + Wendi Ruschmann3255% gamesnot enough data
Jannemieke Keener + Susie Jones303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Polly Hunter
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Esther Cho
16W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Maritza Johnson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.85
Patricia Irby
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Susan Park
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Jannemieke Keener
56W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Gretchen Masselli
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Wendi Ruschmann
68W–67L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Lisa Manley
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Jessicah Collins
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
3
Akanksha Meyer
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
Susie Jones
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Laura Pietro
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.