Teams

Sunset Served Hot

2025 SoCal Tri-Level 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-09-07vs The Royal Tri-AdsWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Clark / SANDI WISE vs Jo Ann Thrailkill / Shannon Koeppen7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Shelly Costello
published
3.95
Lori Lundring
published
3.95
Victoria Silver
published
3.69
Suzie Yamamoto
published
3.69
Mia de Leon
published
3.46
Laura Berger
published
3.38
SANDI WISE
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Sherry Meinhart
published
3.24
Jennifer Khiem
published
3.23
Jennifer Meckfessel
published
3.05
Deborah Cassar
published 3.5
3.00
Tanya Thompson
published
2.99
Callie Paranick
published 3.5
2.96
Marie Smith
published
2.90
2.85
Nora Valentino
published
2.74
JANE HUANG
published 3
2.70
Heather Kawai
published 3
Megan Mathews
published
Susan Dahlberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Kawai + Nora Valentino4251% games+7.2% vs expected
Shelly Costello + Lori Lundring11256% games−0.4% vs expected
SANDI WISE + Tanya Thompson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelly Costello
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
Lori Lundring
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Victoria Silver
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.95
Suzie Yamamoto
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Mia de Leon
19W–22L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Laura Berger
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
SANDI WISE
187W–162L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
Sherry Meinhart
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Jennifer Khiem
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Jennifer Meckfessel
29W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Deborah Cassar
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Tanya Thompson
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Callie Paranick
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Marie Smith
14W–17L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Catherine Loubier
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
Nora Valentino
17W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
JANE HUANG
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Heather Kawai
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Megan Mathews
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Dahlberg
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.