Teams

Cloar/LR/Reb

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-10vs Moore/West/Benton/OCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Sixbey / Crystal Phelps vs Leslie Warford / Elizabeth Cook6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKris Sims / Rebecca Foster vs Christine Summage-West / Karen Jones6-2, 7-5
W#4 DoublesLeslie Cloar / Melissa Perez vs Brenda Green / Sonda LLoyd6-4, 6-3
2025-02-26vs McKeown/Hart/LR/PVCCWon 31
L#1 DoublesChrista Clark / Deanna James vs Bethany Jennings / Lisa McKeown3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJulie Sixbey vs Lindsey Wittenberg6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLeslie Cloar / Anita Mason vs Alison Jones / Bethney Wilson6-0, 6-1
W#4 DoublesKris Sims / Melissa Perez vs Natalie Montague / Amy Varela6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Rhonda Gray
published
3.11
Anita Mason
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Zeynep Vural
published
2.87
Rebecca Foster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Kris Sims
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Leslie Cloar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Julie Sixbey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Holly Larkin
published
2.72
Melissa Perez
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Crystal Phelps
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Leigh Ann Raper
published
2.65
Christa Clark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.38
Deanna James
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Foster + Kris Sims4164% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Cloar + Anita Mason314 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Perez + Crystal Phelps213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rhonda Gray
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.33
3
Anita Mason
37W–22L career · type A · 1 line in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.11
Zeynep Vural
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
Rebecca Foster
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.87
Kris Sims
21W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
Leslie Cloar
18W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.85
Julie Sixbey
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Holly Larkin
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Melissa Perez
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Crystal Phelps
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
Leigh Ann Raper
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Christa Clark
11W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Deanna James
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
81%19%<1%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.