Teams

Je.Jones18S

2026 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-30vs Th.Roschel18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesMichaela DeSoucey vs Courtney Phillips6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesBeth Stagner vs Nicole Nemmers6-2, 7-5
2026-07-15vs Ke.O'Rourke18SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesSandra Truitt vs Alise Fredrickson6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesLauren Hiller vs Kelly O'Rourke2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-07-08vs Cl.Duff18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLauren Daigle vs Claire Duff5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesKenzie Demetros vs Sarah Newton6-7, 0-6
2026-07-01vs Sa.Kane18S3.0Won 21
L#1 SinglesMichaela DeSoucey vs Ellina Max4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRachel Roberson vs Alisa Miller7-6, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBeth Stagner vs Shannon Vinson6-3, 6-1
2026-06-24vs Na.Ivey18SWon 21
W#1 SinglesKendall Stevens vs Viktoriia Saibel6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLauren Hiller vs Sarah Powers7-6, 6-1
L#3 SinglesKenzie Demetros vs Ashley Resta4-6, 2-6
2026-06-17vs Em.Rubin18SWon 21
L#1 SinglesSandra Truitt vs Katie Dickerson0-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesKendall Stevens vs Amy Cagle6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesLauren Daigle vs Brandy Presti6-1, 6-3
2026-06-10vs Sa.BrodyMoses18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesRachel Roberson vs Silpa Yalamanchili7-5, 7-5
W#2 SinglesBeth Stagner vs Karly Zlatic6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMichaela DeSoucey vs Lillia Andrews6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Je.Jones18S7016513160
2Ly.Summitt18S7119513169
3Ma.Basil18S7117717181
4Me.Campbell18S5213819154
5Th.Roschel18S5213819162
6Cl.Duff18S5212920174
7Be.Pegram18S53141024204
8St.Styers18S53121230224
9Em.Rubin18S4314715146
10Ta.Yasin18S3.034111021171
11Na.Ivey18S34101123178
12Ca.Wilborne18S35121226208
13Sa.BrodyMoses18S2591226206
14El.Schacht18S2671735240
15St.Fogarty18S2651940250
16Ke.O'Rourke18S1661534219
17Sa.Kane18S3.01641736228
18Ca.Aden18S0871734236

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Sandra Truitt
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.91
Kendall Stevens
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.89
Rachel Roberson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.87
Beth Stagner
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.83
Lauren Daigle
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.79
Lauren Hiller
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.79
Michaela DeSoucey
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.68
Kenzie Demetros
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Hiller + Kenzie Demetros314 matchesnot enough data
Michaela DeSoucey + Sandra Truitt123 matchesnot enough data
Kenzie Demetros + Beth Stagner303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sandra Truitt
37W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Kendall Stevens
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.91
Rachel Roberson
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
2.5
Beth Stagner
21W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.87
Lauren Daigle
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Lauren Hiller
33W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Michaela DeSoucey
20W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
2.5
Kenzie Demetros
33W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%10%90%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.