Teams

Poe/Chattanooga

2025 Mixed Adult 18 & Over-Chattanooga · 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-05vs MichaelisWon 21
L#1 DoublesAubrie Poe / Patrick Urey vs Julie Briggs / Edis Krnjic4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Phillips / Carl Phillips vs Jacob Quast / Laura Adams6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRommel Ramos / Ana Sanchis vs Kyle Christensen / Emily Donohue Speer6-2, 6-2
2025-06-23vs MichaelisLost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Perry / Zachary Mngo vs Caitlin Michaelis / Shazman Ali3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAubrie Poe / Patrick Urey vs Laura Adams / Jacob Quast6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichael Rollins / Leland Wheland vs Laura Ketcham / Bryce Curry6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-16vs MichaelisWon 21
W#1 DoublesAubrie Poe / Patrick Urey vs Shazman Ali / Stacy Sorrow6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAna Sanchis / Carl Phillips vs Caitlin Haskell / Brian Thomas6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Phillips / Zachary Mngo vs Bryce Curry / Emily Donohue Speer6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-14vs MichaelisLost 12
L#1 DoublesAubrie Poe / Michael Rollins vs Julie Briggs / Edis Krnjic6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAna Sanchis / Rommel Ramos vs Caitlin Haskell / Shazman Ali1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMichelle Phillips / Patrick Urey vs Caitlin Michaelis / Bryce Curry6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Aubrie Poe
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.73
Ana Sanchis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Patrick Urey
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.56
Rommel Ramos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Carl Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Leland Wheland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Rollins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Zachary Mngo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aubrie Poe + Patrick Urey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aubrie Poe
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Ana Sanchis
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Patrick Urey
33W–1L career · 7 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Rommel Ramos
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Carl Phillips
13W–4L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
Leland Wheland
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Rollins
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zachary Mngo
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.