Teams

CROWN GOLD

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - MOUNTAINS

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-25vs CROWN SILVERWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobert Adams / Ken Wanko vs David Baugh / Mark Price7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKipling Gomez / Peter Jacobson vs Shawn Lawrence / Robert Sanderson6-2, 6-0
2026-06-18vs CROWN SILVERWon 20
W#1 DoublesKipling Gomez / Ken Wanko vs Michael Check / Craig Moody6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHoward Freeman / Peter Jacobson vs Shawn Lawrence / Bert Chilson6-2, 6-3
2026-06-11vs CROWN SILVERWon 30
W#1 DoublesPeter Jacobson / Robert Adams vs Mark Price / Shawn Lawrence4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKen Wanko / Rich Pavcek vs Michael Check / Bert Chilson3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJon Zalinski / Howard Freeman vs Mike Cassetty / Cameron Williams6-4, 7-5
2026-06-04vs CROWN SILVERLost 12
W#1 DoublesKipling Gomez / Peter Jacobson vs Mike Cassetty / Michael Check7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHoward Roney / Robert Adams vs Mark Price / David Baugh6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHoward Freeman / Rich Pavcek vs Bert Chilson / Shawn Lawrence4-6, 6-7
2026-05-28vs CROWN SILVERLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Adams / Peter Jacobson vs Michael Check / David Baugh4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKipling Gomez / Ken Wanko vs Mark Price / Cameron Williams6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesHoward Freeman / Howard Roney vs Mike Cassetty / Shawn Lawrence2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Kipling Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Shelley Lundh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Ken Wanko
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Rich Pavcek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Howard Roney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Howard Freeman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jon Zalinski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Jacobson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kipling Gomez
24W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.63
4
Shelley Lundh
75W–121L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Ken Wanko
9W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.55
Rich Pavcek
8W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Howard Roney
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Howard Freeman
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Jon Zalinski
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Peter Jacobson
7W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.