Teams

Fretz

2025 Anne Arundel Singles · Anne Arundel Singles 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.81 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-08vs SandersLost 01
L#1 SinglesEnrico Capitan vs Ty Sanders6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-11-02vs SandersLost 01
L#2 SinglesEnrico Capitan vs Adam Thomasson5-7, 2-6
2025-10-28vs SandersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEnrico Capitan vs Ty Sanders6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesRussell Hester vs Andrew Isch2-6, 1-6
2025-10-25vs SandersLost 03
L#1 SinglesEnrico Capitan vs David Barnhill4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRussell Hester vs Bryan Williams0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesOlugbenga Okubadejo vs Ross Owens1-6, 4-6
2025-10-20vs SandersWon 10
W#3 SinglesRussell Hester vs Andrew Isch6-4, 6-3
2025-09-29vs SandersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEnrico Capitan vs Ross Owens6-3, 7-6
L#3 SinglesJared Gee vs Ty Sanders1-6, 0-6
2025-09-22vs SandersLost 02
L#2 SinglesRussell Hester vs Andrew Isch5-7, 4-6
L#3 SinglesJared Gee vs Ty Sanders0-6, 0-6
2025-09-13vs SandersLost 01
L#3 SinglesOlugbenga Okubadejo vs Nnamaka Nwakaihe6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Jason Pace
published
3.90
Joshua Fretz
published 4
3.77
Enrico Capitan
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.76
JD Zachry
published 4
3.76
Justin Wagner
published
3.62
Brian Kovalski
published 4
3.54
Brian Kuhn
published 4
3.39
Olugbenga Okubadejo
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.26
Russell Hester
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.01
Jared Gee
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JD Zachry + Joshua Fretz11463% games−2.8% vs expected
Enrico Capitan + Joshua Fretz5163% gamesnot enough data
Justin Wagner + JD Zachry303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Pace
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.96
4
Joshua Fretz
161W–117L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Enrico Capitan
88W–85L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
JD Zachry
84W–47L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
Justin Wagner
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Brian Kovalski
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Brian Kuhn
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Olugbenga Okubadejo
256W–209L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Russell Hester
46W–66L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Jared Gee
5W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.