Teams

Zimmerman JTCC

2022 Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over · Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-26vs LoVVLost 01
L#2 DoublesSara Perla / Shelly Choo vs Tammie Wiley / Cynthia Ray5-7, 5-6
2022-06-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesSara Perla / Jennifer Danar vs Brenda Barge / Gail Little6-4, 6-3
2022-06-14vs Lady AcersWon 20
W#1 DoublesCalle Cone / Jennifer Danar vs Pamela Beard / Gail Little6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSara Perla / Theresa Henderson vs Brenda Barge / Maria Miller6-2, 6-1
2022-06-04vs LoVVLost 01
L#1 DoublesSara Perla / Sarah Tsui vs Tammie Wiley / Alexis Cooke0-6, 4-6
2022-05-21vs Serving YouWon 10
W#1 DoublesCalle Cone / Hye-Soo Baek vs Jasmine Beasley / Sheane Robinson6-3, 4-1
2022-04-30vs LoVVLost 01
L#2 DoublesTheresa Henderson / Sara Perla vs Brittany Jennings / Cynthia Ray3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-04-23vs Serving YouSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEmily Schabacker vs LaShon Dean5-2
L#2 DoublesShelly Choo / Sara Perla vs Thaddisa Fulwood / Sheane Robinson0-6, 0-6
2022-04-16vs Lady AcersWon 10
W#1 DoublesCalle Cone / Melanie Babb vs VICTORIA HAMILTON / Maria Miller6-0, 6-0
2022-04-02vs Serving YouSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCalle Cone / Lourdes Sanchez vs Bernadette Carroll / LaShon Dean1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesEmily Schabacker vs Jasmine Beasley6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Emily Schabacker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.55
Calle Cone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Lourdes Sanchez
published
2.38
Sara Perla
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.31
2.14
Theresa Henderson
published
Jordan Zimmerman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Calle Cone + Sara Perla5262% gamesnot enough data
Emily Schabacker + Lourdes Sanchez314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Emily Schabacker
158W–173L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Calle Cone
42W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
2.55
Lourdes Sanchez
32W–45L career · no lines in 2022
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Sara Perla
35W–44L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%82%18%
2.38
2.5
Beverly Carpenter Nickens
0W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
0%93%7%
2.31
Theresa Henderson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Jordan Zimmerman
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marissa Schmauch Womble
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.