Teams

EAnderson (Park Road)

2025 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-06vs LPinzon/SCochran (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesDevon Fuller vs Heather Enlow-Novitsky7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMadelynn Bates / Nicole Brown vs Madelaine LeBlanc / Naomi O'Brien3-6, 2-6
2025-05-01vs JKarsek (Carmel)Split 11
W#1 DoublesDevon Fuller / Emilia Anderson vs Kelli Narveson / Brittany Russell6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMadelynn Bates / Allie Doub vs Caroline Dudley / Morgan Jaulin1-6, 1-6
2025-04-23vs AAltamura/VWooten (Jeff Adams)Won 20
W#2 DoublesMadelynn Bates / Madison Lee vs Virginia Wooten / Ashley Dillon6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDevon Fuller vs Stephanie Sigmon6-1, 6-3
2025-04-17vs TCooper/VSofarelli (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAllie Doub / Madelynn Bates vs Jurga Petrikis / Kimberly Borans3-6, 4-6
2025-03-27vs RPlaisance (Raintree)Won 20
W#1 SinglesDevon Fuller vs Kimberlee Curley6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMadelynn Bates vs Lauren Humphries6-1, 6-3
2025-03-13vs JMugnano (Hornets Nest)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMadelynn Bates / Emma SEGAL vs Victoria Brokaw / Kimberly Wyborski6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDevon Fuller / Julia Orski vs Ashley Bejsovec / Virginia Carley6-1, 6-0
2025-03-06vs ABroemel (Jeff Adams)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMadelynn Bates / Emilia Anderson vs Allison Broemel / Krystal Carmichael6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDevon Fuller vs Janette Billings6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Devon Fuller
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.31
CC Shellabarger
published 3.5
3.10
Emma SEGAL
published 3
3.05
Emilia Anderson
published
3.00
Madelynn Bates
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.74
Allie Doub
published 3
2.67
Lindsay Lillibridge
published
2.65
Julia Orski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emma SEGAL + Emilia Anderson7168% games+8.6% vs expected
Emma SEGAL + Devon Fuller404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Devon Fuller
96W–37L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
3.5
CC Shellabarger
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3
Emma SEGAL
28W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
Emilia Anderson
37W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.05
3
Madelynn Bates
53W–35L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Allie Doub
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Lindsay Lillibridge
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%12%88%
2.67
Julia Orski
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.