Teams

Taconic Sport & Racquet Bruisers

2026 Tri-Level Women · 3.5,3.0,2.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-14vs Solo Women's 4.0 TrilevelWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Flynn-Rand / Gladys Escalante vs Monica Lewis / Juliet Harvey5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-12-07vs Break Point TennisLost 02
L#2 DoublesMaria Moise / Kelly Dore vs Kasey Reynolds / Bridget Fraser6-0, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaria Kurshan / Cathleen Andreucci vs Joey Ackerman / Lachele Coninx-Wiley2-6, 3-6
2025-11-16vs WTLOVLost 02
L#2 DoublesBarbara Salvatoriello / Kelly Curran vs Melanie Redl / Dawn Tomassi1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesIrene Benvenuto / Maria Kurshan vs Robin Osswald / Hannah Keggins7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2025-11-09vs Sportsplex: No Strings AttachedLost 01
L#3 DoublesCathleen Andreucci / Elizabeth Flynn-Rand vs Chelaine Jones / Jennifer Loprieno2-6, 3-6
2025-11-01vs Solo Women's 4.0 TrilevelLost 02
L#2 DoublesKelly Curran / Cheryl Palmer vs Nita Ballantyne / Elizabeth Hammond1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGladys Escalante / Elizabeth Flynn-Rand vs Monica Lewis / Juliet Harvey3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-26vs Break Point TennisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBarbara Salvatoriello / Anna-Marie Dolgov vs Elizabeth Reichheld / Emily Davison6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesIrene Benvenuto / Elizabeth Flynn-Rand vs Bridget Fraser / Anna Greig0-6, 3-6
2025-10-05vs Southern: WTLOVLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Dore / Cheryl Palmer vs Lucy Drotning / Gabrielle Melton3-6, 5-7
2025-09-28vs Sportsplex: No Strings AttachedLost 01
L#3 DoublesGladys Escalante / Cathleen Andreucci vs Chelaine Jones / Kelly Ennis-senato6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5,3.0,2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Gina Imperiale
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.48
Sarah Herlihy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Susan Leary
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.33
Rika Tanous
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Aimee Heinly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Christine Young
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Nancy Yi
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Maria Hickey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Kelly Curran
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.95
Susan Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.86
Maria Moise
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Kelly Dore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Anna-Marie Dolgov
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Cheryl Palmer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Barbara Salvatoriello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Irene Benvenuto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Gladys Escalante
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Laurie Hutchison
published
2.32
Elizabeth Flynn-Rand
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Cathleen Andreucci
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.10
Maria Kurshan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Paiva
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gina Imperiale + Susan Leary9263% games+11.5% vs expected
Susan Leary + Aimee Heinly4358% games+9.3% vs expected
Rika Tanous + Sarah Herlihy101055% games+8.9% vs expected
Susan Cooper + Gina Imperiale12558% games+7.5% vs expected
Christine Young + Aimee Heinly6455% games+6.9% vs expected
Susan Cooper + Susan Leary3451% games+6.1% vs expected
Susan Cooper + Rika Tanous8359% games+4.9% vs expected
Sarah Herlihy + Maria Hickey15456% games+4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gina Imperiale
82W–43L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Sarah Herlihy
88W–63L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Susan Leary
116W–88L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Rika Tanous
128W–103L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Aimee Heinly
56W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Christine Young
66W–77L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Nancy Yi
33W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Maria Hickey
136W–76L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Kelly Curran
68W–59L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Susan Cooper
85W–39L career · 5 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.95
Maria Moise
65W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Kelly Dore
35W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
2.85
3
Anna-Marie Dolgov
29W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Cheryl Palmer
39W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Barbara Salvatoriello
8W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.64
Irene Benvenuto
29W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
Gladys Escalante
27W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%38%62%
2.54
Laurie Hutchison
19W–27L career · no lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
Elizabeth Flynn-Rand
24W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Cathleen Andreucci
5W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Maria Kurshan
10W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Linda Paiva
13W–22L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.