Teams

QRRC-Merkle

2024 OH OV WINTER 18&O Mixed · Winter 18&O 8.0MXD

18 players · average NTRP 4.33 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-26vs SRTC-MullinsLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmanda Schuler / Matt Clouse vs Carol Poe / Jonathan Westfall6-7, 3-6
2024-04-12vs QRRC-BurkleWon 10
W#3 DoublesMatt Clouse / Megan Kreusch vs Dylan Donaldson / Lunilia Crespo6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-04-05vs KTC-StevensWon 10
W#3 DoublesMatt Clouse / Amanda Schuler vs Natalie Denker / Steven Jain2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-03-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesMiranda Riggs / James Riggs vs Carol Poe / Bob Lyons6-3, 6-0
2024-02-24vs QRRC-BurkleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMiranda Riggs / James Riggs vs Kyle Webb / Elizabeth Schaefer6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJason Merkle / Megan Kreusch vs Lisa Metzcar / Luke Hoban2-6, 2-6
2024-02-18vs SRTC-MullinsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMatt Clouse / Amanda Schuler vs Jonathan Westfall / Carol Poe6-4, 6-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Winter 18&O 8.0MXD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Katie Boeckman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.36
Nicole Merkle
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.25
Anne Lutz
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.13
Jonathan Scherquist
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.12
James Riggs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Jason Merkle
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.10
Luke Trubee
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.96
Matt Clouse
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.90
Amanda Schuler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Samuel Garay
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Jessica Shively
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Rachael Avers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Rodolfo Aguilera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Keith Boroczk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kendra Avers
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Megan Kreusch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Miranda Riggs
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Sidney Purks
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Merkle + Rodolfo Aguilera6260% games+10.4% vs expected
Amanda Schuler + Matt Clouse5259% games+7.2% vs expected
Rodolfo Aguilera + Katie Boeckman7163% games+1.6% vs expected
Nicole Merkle + Jason Merkle2450% games+0.8% vs expected
Rachael Avers + Rodolfo Aguilera5353% games−8.5% vs expected
Miranda Riggs + Samuel Garay5169% gamesnot enough data
Sidney Purks + Rodolfo Aguilera3261% gamesnot enough data
Nicole Merkle + Luke Trubee404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Boeckman
113W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
4.44
Nicole Merkle
98W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Anne Lutz
68W–35L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.25
Jonathan Scherquist
40W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
4.13
James Riggs
25W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Jason Merkle
196W–91L career · 7 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
4.11
Luke Trubee
101W–25L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
4.10
Matt Clouse
49W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Amanda Schuler
19W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
Samuel Garay
37W–18L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Jessica Shively
80W–45L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Rachael Avers
78W–63L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.31
Rodolfo Aguilera
121W–49L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Keith Boroczk
77W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kendra Avers
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Kreusch
37W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Miranda Riggs
51W–9L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sidney Purks
45W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.