Teams

MFigard (Matthews)

2023 Adult 65 & Over League · 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Mon AM

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-17vs LO'Shea (Southampton)Won 10
W#3 DoublesScarlet Rogers / Patti Ratcliffe vs W Kay Bridges / Susan Stover6-3, 6-4
2023-03-31Won 10
W#3 DoublesPatti Ratcliffe / Marla Figard vs Christine Norman / Janis Rapp6-2, 6-1
2023-03-13vs PKahle (Charlotte Indoor)Won 10
W#3 DoublesPatti Ratcliffe / Rosa Szalanski vs Gillian Murrell / Kate Blankenship0-1
2023-03-06vs CHobson (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesDorothy Gandar / Patti Ratcliffe vs Barbara Northrup / Jane Neese6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-27vs CThilo (Pine Lake)Won 10
W#3 DoublesSue Busby / Patti Ratcliffe vs Sharon Surrett / Susan Johnson6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Mon AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Karen Watford
published
3.35
Anne Sykes
published 3.5
3.34
Suzanne Roxburgh
published
3.31
Patti Ratcliffe
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.28
Elaine Myers
published 3.5
3.27
Sally Lowrance
published
3.21
Rosa Szalanski
published
Dorothy Gandar
published
Marla Figard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Roxburgh + Sally Lowrance5165% games+1.6% vs expected
Anne Sykes + Patti Ratcliffe213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Watford
29W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Anne Sykes
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
Suzanne Roxburgh
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Patti Ratcliffe
57W–24L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Elaine Myers
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
Sally Lowrance
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Rosa Szalanski
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Dorothy Gandar
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marla Figard
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.