Teams

Greene-Lamb/Greeneville

2026 Adult 18 & Over-Greeneville · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-12vs Lovelace/GreenevilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesNeva Kilday / Anneke Self vs Margaret Wells / Madga Cox6-4, 6-3
2026-05-05vs Lovelace/GreenevilleWon 10
W#3 DoublesNeva Kilday / Anneke Self vs Linda Cowart / Joan Hagood6-0, 6-0
2026-04-27vs Lovelace/GreenevilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoy Benson / Anneke Self vs Christina Betancourt / Anita Jilton3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNeva Kilday / Laura Mitchel vs Joan Hagood / Brittany Ishmael7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBarb Janiszewski / Katie Raby vs Madga Cox / Margaret Wells1-6, 1-6
2026-04-20vs Lovelace/GreenevilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoy Benson / Anneke Self vs Anita Jilton / Joan Hagood6-0, 6-1
2026-04-13vs Lovelace/GreenevilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesBarb Janiszewski / Laura Mitchel vs Lynne Little / Eve Little Bradford0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lovelace/Greeneville411551298
2Greene-Lamb/Greeneville1451530194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Neva Kilday
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Anneke Self
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Joy Benson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Barb Janiszewski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neva Kilday
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Anneke Self
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.78
Joy Benson
27W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Barb Janiszewski
12W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.