Teams

C 6.5W GR Bullach

2023 NEOTA Combo Fall · NEOTA 6.5 Combo W Fall

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-11-17vs C 6.5W BR SweeneyWon 21
L#1 DoublesAshley Bullach / Kimberly Williams vs Francie Morrow / Kristin Zalenski4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi MacLane-Hodges / Patricia Johnson vs Kelly Sweeney / Sarah Johnson7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristina Terzola / Kara Wedekamm vs Traci Tsai / Christine Altman6-3, 7-6
2023-11-12vs C 6.5W TP2 McPhieLost 12
W#1 DoublesAshley Bullach / Jana Schweikert vs Ann Lynch / Tanya Durbin6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Adkins / Julie Jones vs Christina McPhie / Tricia Graham6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCathy Wilhelm / Lisa Bortz vs Kelley Jones / Susan Voth6-7, 2-6
2023-11-04vs C 6.5W NC DaltonLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Adkins / Kimberly Williams vs Michelle Dalton / Julianne Yang4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristina Terzola / Jana Schweikert vs Wendi Preston / Lora Kilkenny7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichelle Ross / Tammy Iams vs Jo Ann Cecchini / Jessica Trent6-1, 6-4
2023-10-29vs C 6.5W CC GarsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichelle Ross / Jana Schweikert vs Shelby Novick / Marnie Walcutt5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHeidi MacLane-Hodges / Patricia Johnson vs Nancy Sobecks / Michelle Kuhn7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAshley Bullach / Kara Wedekamm vs Trina Galauner / VICKI PARKER4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-10-22vs C 6.5W AS WimerWon 21
W#1 DoublesAshley Bullach / Kimberly Williams vs Melinda Thomas / Larisa Fiorita6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCathy Wilhelm / Kara Wedekamm vs Kathryn Wiggam / Anne Sturbaum5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHeidi MacLane-Hodges / Lisa Bortz vs Kathy Stitzlein / Nini Curcione6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-10-15vs C 6.5W BR SweeneyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Ross / Jana Schweikert vs Kelly Sweeney / Allison Chiofolo6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesPatricia Johnson / Heidi MacLane-Hodges vs Annette McCann / Sara Timken6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDenise Fehr / Kara Wedekamm vs Torie Utterback / Tiffany Ruwadi3-6, 4-6
2023-10-07vs C 6.5W TP2 McPhieLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Adkins / Jana Schweikert vs Carolyn Cheverine / Tricia Graham7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDenise Fehr / Lisa Bortz vs Lori Young / Tanya Durbin1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristina Terzola / Teresa Kozak vs Nora McClaren / Susan Voth6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2023-10-01vs C 6.5W NC DaltonWon 21
L#1 DoublesAshley Bullach / Kimberly Williams vs Shannon Zaher / Michelle Dalton4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKara Wedekamm / Patricia Johnson vs Wendi Preston / Joey Hass6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Adkins / Jana Schweikert vs Megan Lynch / Dana Pinney6-3, 6-0
2023-09-22vs C 6.5W CC GarsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Ross / Kara Wedekamm vs Meghan McCaulley / Rosemary Cugliari1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Terzola / Heidi MacLane-Hodges vs Brooke Garson / Trina Galauner1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAshley Bullach / Teresa Kozak vs Dana Butler / Melissa Becker3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-17vs C 6.5W AS WimerWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Ross / Lisa Bortz vs Kathryn Wiggam / Bethany Nussbaum6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Adkins / Julie Jones vs Kathy Stitzlein / Anne Sturbaum3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDenise Fehr / Tammy Iams vs Larisa Fiorita / Melinda Thomas7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings30 teams · NEOTA 6.5 Combo W Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 6.5W MV3 Zhang10023718221
2C 6.5W WE Lodge912648165
3C 6.5W CC Garson9124614166
4C 6.5W AO1 Keohane8223717215
5C 6.5W MV2 Kirchick8222824249
6C 6.5W BA Pavlish82201026235
7C 6.5W PM Leohr7321921221
8C 6.5W PW4 Lawrence73191124225
9C 6.5W TP1 Consilio64181226260
10C 6.5W BR Sweeney64181231261
11C 6.5W GR Bullach64171332275
12C 6.5W CV1 Derbyshire64151533281
13C 6.5W PW3 Hensley64131736294
14C 6.5W MM Bramhall55171329243
15C 6.5W CRC Garten55161431247
16C 6.5W AVB Pallante55151534274
17C 6.5W LT Banas55141635276
18C 6.5W WR3 Treblas55131741295
19C 6.5W NR Kariotakis46151535274
20C 6.5W NC Dalton46111942305
21C 6.5W AS Wimer37102041288
22C 6.5W PW2 Frazier37111943310
23C 6.5W CV2 Frederick37102044315
24C 6.5W FRR McBride3782248318
25C 6.5W AO2 Pecko28102042314
26C 6.5W TP2 McPhie28102045322
27C 6.5W WR2 Roberts2892146304
28C 6.5W MV1 Gorjup2862450325
29C 6.5W PW1 Blesi1972348322
30C 6.5W WR1 Miller01072348331

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Christina Terzola
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.37
Ashley Bullach
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Patricia Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Cathy Wilhelm
published 3.5
3.18
Susan Adkins
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.14
Denise Fehr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.85
Heidi MacLane-Hodges
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.78
Jana Schweikert
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
2.64
Kara Wedekamm
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.64
Lisa Bortz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.48
Tammy Iams
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.34
Teresa Kozak
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Michelle Ross
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi MacLane-Hodges + Patricia Johnson7160% games+13.6% vs expected
Jana Schweikert + Patricia Johnson3361% games+12.5% vs expected
Kara Wedekamm + Heidi MacLane-Hodges18758% games+8.9% vs expected
Jana Schweikert + Ashley Bullach5456% games+6.6% vs expected
Susan Adkins + Christina Terzola8165% games+6.2% vs expected
Christina Terzola + Denise Fehr6354% games+5.6% vs expected
Jana Schweikert + Heidi MacLane-Hodges131054% games+5.3% vs expected
Christina Terzola + Ashley Bullach14557% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Terzola
103W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.52
3.5
Ashley Bullach
134W–88L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.37
Patricia Johnson
75W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.35
3.5
Cathy Wilhelm
30W–26L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Adkins
88W–87L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Denise Fehr
101W–102L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.14
3
Heidi MacLane-Hodges
118W–143L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
Jana Schweikert
91W–98L career · 9 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
Kara Wedekamm
92W–101L career · 8 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
2.64
Lisa Bortz
44W–102L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
2.64
Tammy Iams
65W–152L career · 5 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.48
Teresa Kozak
52W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
2.34
Michelle Ross
35W–50L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.