Teams

Escambia/Pfeifle

2025 Escambia Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Combo 50 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-13vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Valerie Wilson vs Kelly Dempsey / Sue Nast6-1, 7-5
2025-12-06vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesGloria Langan / Marina Agadzi vs Mecy Wimberly / Kelly Dempsey6-1, 6-4
2025-11-24vs Wallace - RS ClaySplit 11
W#2 DoublesGloria Langan / Marina Agadzi vs Tracey Mcclurd / Sue Nast5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTonya Pfeifle / Chelsea Simpson vs Jacqueline Wallace / Donna Madison6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-11-15vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarina Agadzi / Tonya Pfeifle vs Jacqueline Wallace / Kristyn Miller6-3, 6-1
2025-11-13vs Wallace - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarina Agadzi / Denise Wilson vs Tracey Mcclurd / Mecy Wimberly4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-11vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarina Agadzi / Dodi Stringfellow vs Catherine Matthews / Thuy Nguyen6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-27vs Wallace - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesTonya Pfeifle / Gloria Langan vs Kristyn Miller / Thuy Nguyen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Tonya Pfeifle
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.59
Marina Agadzi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Denise Prindiville
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Chelsea Simpson
published 3.5
3.34
Jill Gonzalez
published
3.33
Valerie Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Gloria Langan
published
3.22
Dodi Stringfellow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Denise Wilson
published 3.5
Elizabeth Locklear
published
Tanya Hughes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dodi Stringfellow + Tonya Pfeifle6354% games+10.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tonya Pfeifle
154W–65L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Marina Agadzi
42W–59L career · 8 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Denise Prindiville
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Chelsea Simpson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Jill Gonzalez
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Valerie Wilson
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
Gloria Langan
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Dodi Stringfellow
120W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Denise Wilson
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Elizabeth Locklear
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tanya Hughes
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.