← Teams

Mc.Keenan Osman18S

2023 Cap Fall Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-10-05vs Je.McIntyre18SLost 0–1
L#2 SinglesAmie Irby vs Elisabeth Van Order4-6, 0-6
2023-09-30vs Je.McIntyre18SLost 0–2
L#2 SinglesMcKenzie Keenan Osman vs Candace Hoffman6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMelanie Tharrington vs Sarah Overholser5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-09-28vs Je.McIntyre18SSplit 1–1
W#1 SinglesMcKenzie Keenan Osman vs Anna Kouba6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLee Veit vs Elisabeth Van Order4-6, 3-6
2023-09-21vs Je.McIntyre18SSplit 1–1
L#1 SinglesMcKenzie Keenan Osman vs Jessica McIntyre6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMelanie Tharrington vs Candace Hoffman6-4, 6-2
2023-09-19vs Je.McIntyre18SLost 0–2
L#1 SinglesAmie Irby vs Jessica McIntyre1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesCameron Ellerbe vs Elisabeth Van Order6-7, 6-7
2023-09-14vs Je.McIntyre18SLost 0–1
L#3 SinglesLee Veit vs Sarah Overholser6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-09-12vs Je.McIntyre18SWon 2–0
W#2 SinglesCameron Ellerbe vs Sarah Overholser6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesLee Veit vs Catie Cunningham6-3, 6-1
2023-08-24vs Je.McIntyre18SWon 2–0
W#1 SinglesMelanie Tharrington vs Tyler Cunningham6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesLee Veit vs Kristin Kash6-2, 6-3
2023-08-17vs Je.McIntyre18SWon 2–1
L#1 SinglesMelanie Tharrington vs Elisabeth Van Order3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesCameron Ellerbe vs Tyler Cunningham6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAmie Irby vs Candace Hoffman4-6, 4-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Mary Beth Broyles
published —
3.37
McKenzie Keenan Osman
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.36
Melanie Tharrington
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Cameron Ellerbe
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Allison Glenn
published 3.5
3.29
Lee Veit
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Amie Irby
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amie Irby + Cameron Ellerbe1–444% gamesnot enough data
Cameron Ellerbe + Melanie Tharrington2–24 matchesnot enough data
Amie Irby + Lee Veit1–23 matchesnot enough data
Amie Irby + McKenzie Keenan Osman2–13 matchesnot enough data
Cameron Ellerbe + Lee Veit1–23 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—
Mary Beth Broyles
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
McKenzie Keenan Osman
129W–123L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Melanie Tharrington
86W–90L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Cameron Ellerbe
124W–89L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Allison Glenn
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Lee Veit
83W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Amie Irby
99W–119L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.