Teams

UPTA18TL/Nabke/Kroc

2026 UPTA Tri-Level 18 & Over · 18+ TL Women - 3.0, 3.5, 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-17vs UPTA18TL/Herford/Neely FarmSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMarlena Nabke / Kelsey Mathias vs Elizabeth Raduns / Patricia Surles7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMara Townsend / Angie Hill vs Lora Pfohl / Emily Gunderson7-6, 5-4
2026-07-03vs UPTA18TL/Franz/ButlerSpringsLost 12
W#1 DoublesIna Cottingham / Abigail Bliss vs Rebecca Haas / Jane Koubek6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMarlena Nabke / Joy Ivester vs Naomi Kozawa / Michelle Scott6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMara Townsend / Erin Carroll vs George-Anna Lyden / Stefani Wallen-Smith3-6, 3-6
2026-06-12vs UPTA (A) 4.0W 18 & Over (O'Shea)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesIna Cottingham / Taya Kretz-Notelle vs Drake Gribbin / Carter Andrews5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJoy Ivester / Cathy Stevens vs M Christine von Wyl / Ali Hill6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMara Townsend / Angie Hill vs Taylor Oliver / Whitney Blum3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-05vs UPTA18TL/Brading/HollyTreeSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKelly Gauntner / Marlena Nabke vs Corinne Nickell / Lara Knight6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAngie Hill / Mara Townsend vs Suzy Clary / Gretchen Lawson6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ TL Women - 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Leila Dudley
published
3.48
Tinsley Hallman
published
3.40
Cathy Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
LINDSAY KAPLAN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Abigail Bliss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Leah Wynn
published
3.28
Ina Cottingham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Kelsey Mathias
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Taya Kretz-Notelle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Kelly Gauntner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Joy Ivester
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Marlena Nabke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Mara Townsend
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Annmarie Howard
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Ivester + LINDSAY KAPLAN2359% games+8.3% vs expected
Kelsey Mathias + Kelly Gauntner6353% games+5.5% vs expected
Ina Cottingham + Leila Dudley4359% games−0.1% vs expected
Kelly Gauntner + LINDSAY KAPLAN101549% games−2.3% vs expected
Marlena Nabke + Kelly Gauntner3250% gamesnot enough data
Joy Ivester + Leah Wynn3249% gamesnot enough data
Marlena Nabke + Joy Ivester134 matchesnot enough data
Mara Townsend + Joy Ivester224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leila Dudley
19W–15L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Tinsley Hallman
14W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Cathy Stevens
26W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.40
LINDSAY KAPLAN
28W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
4
Abigail Bliss
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
80%20%<1%
3.38
Leah Wynn
22W–12L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Ina Cottingham
17W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.28
Kelsey Mathias
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
Taya Kretz-Notelle
18W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.14
Kelly Gauntner
22W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
Joy Ivester
22W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Marlena Nabke
10W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.85
Mara Townsend
31W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Annmarie Howard
12W–20L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.