Teams

LCTA40/Price/LTP-DI

2022 USTA 40 & Over Spring · 40 & over Men 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-20vs LCTA40/Upshaw/DI ClubLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Johnson / Brian Kornahrens vs Joseph Lusardi / Thomas Upshaw1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-03-30vs LCTA40/Sciortino/HamlinLost 01
L#1 DoublesBenjy Cooke / Brian Johnson vs Thomas Browne / Brian Boss0-6, 1-6
2022-03-28vs LCTA40/Fellabom/I'OnWon 10
W#1 DoublesBryan Gawrych / Brian Johnson vs Daniel Lewis / Mike Russo3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-03-10vs LCTA40/Cooke/MPRWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnthony Dedoes / Brian Johnson vs Brian Johnson / Carter Rowson6-4, 7-5
2022-02-23vs LCTA40/TUNICK/PARKWESTLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Johnson / Brian Sakre vs Ryan Zimmerman / Drew Heinold3-6, 4-6
2022-02-09vs LCTA40/Miller/MPRWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Johnson / Brian Sakre vs Sean Houseal / David White6-3, 7-5
2022-02-02vs LCTA40/Yarborough/Dunes WestLost 01
L#1 DoublesAaron Zych / Brian Johnson vs Greg Colbrunn / Mike Zettel1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & over Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
MacIej Dziurgot
published
3.39
Brian Whirrett
published 3.5
3.35
Derek Goulette
published 3.5
3.33
Anthony Dedoes
published 3.5
3.32
William Lark
published
3.27
Brian Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.21
Tony Colizzi
published
3.13
Dana Cumbie
published 3.5
3.08
Gary Snyder
published 3
2.69
Robert Brame
published
Jochen Mendetzki
published
Rhett Price
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tony Colizzi + William Lark8654% games+7.5% vs expected
MacIej Dziurgot + Brian Whirrett27764% games+6.7% vs expected
Gary Snyder + William Lark6165% gamesnot enough data
Rhett Price + Brian Whirrett134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MacIej Dziurgot
118W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Brian Whirrett
53W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Derek Goulette
10W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Anthony Dedoes
41W–26L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
William Lark
63W–49L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Brian Johnson
130W–111L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Tony Colizzi
38W–27L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Dana Cumbie
46W–52L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.13
3
Gary Snyder
40W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%26%74%
3.08
Robert Brame
23W–33L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Jochen Mendetzki
12W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rhett Price
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.