Teams

WTC - Johnson 18 & Over 6.5 Combo

2026 Dothan USTA Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-05vs DO- PostonLost 12
W#1 DoublesCallie Ventress / Millie Watson vs Faith Harmon / Jenny Nelson6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Dozier / Kylie Harris vs Katrina Leadbetter / Allison Edwards1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJulia Johnson / Sarah Tolleson vs Lily Mendoza / Caitlin Perry1-6, 4-6
2026-07-29vs DO- PostonLost 12
W#1 DoublesMillie Watson / Callie Ventress vs Katrina Leadbetter / Angie Mcdaniel5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Tolleson / Amanda Roberson vs Lily Mendoza / Caitlin Perry3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Barron / Caroline Dozier vs Faith Harmon / Margaret Poston6-7, 0-6
2026-07-22vs DO- PostonLost 12
L#1 DoublesKylie Harris / Callie Ventress vs Helen Mendheim / Jenny Nelson0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMillie Watson / Julia Johnson vs Caitlin Perry / Katie Lewis6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCaroline Dozier / Sarah Tolleson vs Margaret Poston / Katherine Martin2-6, 3-6
2026-07-15vs DO- PostonLost 12
W#1 DoublesMillie Watson / Callie Ventress vs Allison Edwards / Lily Mendoza6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAshley Barron / Amanda Roberson vs Margaret Poston / Faith Harmon2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCaroline Dozier / Kylie Harris vs Katrina Leadbetter / Caitlin Perry2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Callie Ventress
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Millie Watson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Kylie Harris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.55
Ashley Barron
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Sarah Tolleson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Callie Ventress + Millie Watson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Callie Ventress
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Millie Watson
10W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Kylie Harris
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.91
2.5
Ashley Barron
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%36%64%
2.55
Sarah Tolleson
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.